Originally posted by robbie carrobieI think we can safely assume that just about anything we can imagine as conceivably happening, has happened. But if we were to avoid doing whatever has led someone to do something we disapprove of, we would stay in bed all day. No, that wouldn't work, would it...😉
If one is inclined towards persons of the same sex and who fantasise about persons of the same sex which i assume they must do when masturbating, yes, i think its possible. The article makes it clear that if a persons engages in sexual fantasises they may seek out other persons, i dare say that it has happened and may lead to a homosexual act.
Originally posted by Zambonerok, i apologise, sorry you are very civil, you can google the human gnome project.
Hey, there's no need to "you got that?" with me. I'm a civil guy and we can disagree in a civilized manner. There's no need to resort to aggressive behaviour.
Tell me more about this human gnome project. I thought midget sex was more a fringe fetish than a topic of interest in the scientific community.
Originally posted by JS357we are Christians, we are under duress help people overcome sinful tendencies which they may or may not act upon.
I think we can safely assume that just about anything we can imagine as conceivably happening, has happened. But if we were to avoid doing whatever has led someone to do something we disapprove of, we would stay in bed all day. No, that wouldn't work, would it...😉
Originally posted by robbie carrobieActually, just because they haven't found a single gene that specifies sexuality doesn't mean that it is a choice.
Its not news to me, you asked the question, you got the answer. I dont believe the once a homosexual always a homosexual, its nonsense. There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality, if there was, the the human gnome project would have identified a cause and here is news for you, they didn't find the so called gay ...[text shortened]... ality in such ludicrous terms, you got that? Good then perhaps you will come to terms with it.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/253971.php
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121211083212.htm
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh yeah. You had to do it. Right.
LOL, no its not like the research i had to do on 'fisting;, which was very disturbing to say the least. In fact, i was almost physically sick.
I'm pretty sure one can get the jist of what fisting is without the aid of grainy videos from sketchy websites.
Originally posted by PsychoPawnjust because someone is predisposed it does not mean the predisposition is a causation anyway, even so , there is NO conclusive empirical evidence that homosexuality is genetic. Now you can either accept the fact or not, but its a myth to say that there is.
Actually, just because they haven't found a single gene that specifies sexuality doesn't mean that it is a choice.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/253971.php
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/12/121211083212.htm
Originally posted by Zamboneractually there were some images from some Swedish dude on a paper that he produced which i stumbled upon while looking for statistics, did he really need to illustrate the concept?
Oh yeah. You had to do it. Right.
I'm pretty sure one can get the jist of what fisting is without the aid of grainy videos from sketchy websites.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNeither of those articles said that this was simply a predisposition so that's irrelevant.
just because someone is predisposed it does not mean the predisposition is a causation anyway, even so , there is NO conclusive empirical evidence that homosexuality is genetic. Now you can either accept the fact or not, but its a myth to say that there is.
There is a lot more evidence that it is not a choice than there is that it is a choice.
I don't believe in myths, that's why I am not religious.
Originally posted by PsychoPawnyou believe the immutability myth.
Neither of those articles said that this was simply a predisposition so that's irrelevant.
There is a lot more evidence that it is not a choice than there is that it is a choice.
I don't believe in myths, that's why I am not religious.
Originally posted by PsychoPawnno, maybe i should simply go and do something more constructive instead or remonstrating here.
I don't even know what that is. Is it that people can't change? Then no, I don't believe that at all.
Maybe you should try asking me what I believe instead of telling me what I believe.