Originally posted by robbie carrobiebut you just said "There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality", did you not?
why are you equating an anomaly (homosexuality) with a normality (heterosexuality), clearly genetically we are designed to pass on the genetic blueprint to the next generation, this we are told is the purpose of procreation, homosexuality therefore makes no sense, so your analogy is essentially flawed, you are attempting to equate an anomaly with a n ...[text shortened]... lling to argue that genetically the blueprint is not to reproduce itself in the next generation.
1 edit
Originally posted by Suziannenope I said there was no single empirical genetic evidence which predisposes someone towards homosexuality. It simply does not make genetic sense. Please dont put words in my mouth nor misrepresent what i have said.
but you just said "There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality", did you not?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieReally? Are you saying you did NOT write this post?
nope I said there was no single empirical genetic evidence which predisposes someone towards homosexuality. It simply does not make genetic sense. Please dont put words in my mouth nor misrepresent what i have said.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its not news to me, you asked the question, you got the answer. I dont believe the once a homosexual always a homosexual, its nonsense. There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality, if there was, the the human gnome project would have identified a cause and here is news for you, they didn't find the so called gay gene, its a nonsense and a materialistic myth to define something as complex as sexuality in such ludicrous terms, you got that? Good then perhaps you will come to terms with it.
You may apologize to me in your next post, thanks.
1 edit
Originally posted by Suzianne
Really? Are you saying you did NOT write this post?Originally posted by robbie carrobie
[b]Its not news to me, you asked the question, you got the answer. I dont believe the once a homosexual always a homosexual, its nonsense. There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards a particular sexuality, if there was, the the human gnom u will come to terms with it.
You may apologize to me in your next post, thanks.[/b]nope it is evident from the context that homosexuality is implied, i have not insulted you and i will not issue an apology. Your pedantry has no place here.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou should have said "There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards homosexuality", then. So did you misrepresent yourself? It certainly wasn't me.
nope it is evident from the context that homosexuality is implied, i have not insulted you and i will not issue an apology. Your pedantry has no place here.
Originally posted by Suzianneany reasoning person could understand what was implied from the context. that is any one who is not gnat straining and camel gulping.
You should have said "There is NO genetic evidence that predisposes one towards homosexuality", then. So did you misrepresent yourself? It certainly wasn't me.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI will classify you as "interested" in the legislative implications of the moral code you espouse. That is, you have an interest.
Merely commenting upon what the implications of a certain political strategy may be is not to say that I personally desire legislating for the moral code that I espouse, is it. why am I concerned? because its a manipulation and a distortion of reality and it has misled all sorts of persons to adopt all manner of strange policy. When a Christian l ...[text shortened]... or what has transpired is the suppression of the natural faculty of conscience and an injustice.