Go back
Meat Eating

Meat Eating

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

@rajk999 said
Your insults and your self promotion and boasting says it all about the kind of person you are. This is a discussion forum. Post your comments and leave out the fluff and nonsense. Save that when you home speaking to your wife.
Quit sputtering out misinformation. Quit making assertions based on what you think the Bible says and check your facts.

1 edit

@secondson said
Quit sputtering out misinformation. Quit making assertions based on what you think the Bible says and check your facts.
Ok Mr braindead church sycophant, show me one reference where these people [kings and big guys etc] were condemned by God for having more than one wife.

There are many references to God condemning these very same people for other sins. You would find that God is silent on the issue of polygamy. Silence implies consent especially when God is very vocal about sins.

You may want to take this question to your church elders. I think you have neither the knowledge nor the wisdom to answer properly

Vote Up
Vote Down

@rajk999 said
Ok Mr braindead church sycophant, show me one reference where these people [kings and big guys etc] were condemned by God for having more than one wife.

There are many references to God condemning these very same people for other sins. You would find that God is silent on the issue of polygamy. Silence implies consent especially when God is very vocal about sins.

You ...[text shortened]... tion to your church elders. I think you have neither the knowledge nor the wisdom to answer properly
You have an oddball perspective on biblical concepts to say the least.

I never said, nor did I imply or infer that God "condemned" any of the "kings and big guys" for anything. In fact you are wrong to suggest that God condemned them for anything at all, but it is abundantly evident from the scriptures that they did suffer the consequences of their choices, and I seriously doubt you would understand how that is so since your knowledge of the story line is at best superficial.

For example: Moses was not allowed to enter into the promise land for something he did. Do you know what that was? Quickly now go look it up. I would be surprised and delighted if you can find it and draw the same conclusion as taught by the scriptures.

1 edit

@secondson said
You have an oddball perspective on biblical concepts to say the least.

I never said, nor did I imply or infer that God "condemned" any of the "kings and big guys" for anything. In fact you are wrong to suggest that God condemned them for anything at all, but it is abundantly evident from the scriptures that they did suffer the consequences of their choices, and I serious ...[text shortened]... surprised and delighted if you can find it and draw the same conclusion as taught by the scriptures.
Playing with words and avoiding the issue... typical. Seeing you are a bit slow or trying to deceive here is an example of what Im referring to:

David committed murder and adultery and the bible states this: ...But the thing that David had done displeased the LORD. (2 Samuel 11:27 KJV)

Provide one reference where these people who had wives and concubines by the dozens and even hundreds, displeased God.


Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
You're indeed "offering" a bizarre "moment".

That the two little fish weren't alive when Jesus miraculously reproduced them by the thousands is irrelevant to the matter of man's diet in eternity.

It wasn't in heaven when and where the miracle occurred.

In the eternal state there will be no death. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that that means nothing will die there.

And it is truly bizarre to imagine, and assert, that God will create dead meat to eat to offset the concept of NO DEATH.

I simply can't imagine dead flesh on the menu in heaven.



-Removed-
God bought it from the Chinese. They making fake fish, fake burgers, fake chicken etc. Heard it tastes like the real thing too.


Vote Up
Vote Down

@rajk999 said
Playing with words and avoiding the issue... typical. Seeing you are a bit slow or trying to deceive here is an example of what Im referring to:

David committed murder and adultery and the bible states this: ...But the thing that David had done displeased the LORD. (2 Samuel 11:27 KJV)

Provide one reference where these people who had wives and concubines by the dozens and even hundreds, displeased God.
Perhaps you will recant on your assertion when you discover your mistaken perception of the passage you quoted.

Read the context. Start back as far as verse 18.

Clearly, the verse you quoted doesn't mean what you think it means.

The "thing" David did that "displeased" the LORD was that David "...fetched her to his house, and she became his wife,.."

Your "example" is really only an example of your poor reading and comprehension abilities. I expect you will respond to this post with more of your convoluted twisting and squirming and deflecting.


-Removed-
Nobody goes to heaven. There are two separate Kingdoms. The first is the millennial reign of Christ on the earth. The next one is the New Jerusalem. The first will have meat-eaters. The next one will have no death and no killing of animals. All the inhabitants of this second Kingdom will have spiritual bodies, not physical bodies that need food.

1 edit

-Removed-
IF we assume God is capable of anything, and as Christians we should believe that, then the answer is yes that God created fishand bread for people to eat. Whether or not they were alive is not an issue for me. God can speak bread and fish into existence... probably grilled with sour dough bread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
There were five thousand men on one occasion, and that was predominantly a Jewish crowd. Counting the addition of women and children the number was probably closer to ten thousand.

The other occasion was of four thousand men, and it was a Gentile group.

Of course I believe it was real! Don't you? All of the miracles Jesus performed are true events recorded for all time.

1 edit

@secondson said
Perhaps you will recant on your assertion when you discover your mistaken perception of the passage you quoted.

Read the context. Start back as far as verse 18.

Clearly, the verse you quoted doesn't mean what you think it means.

The "thing" David did that "displeased" the LORD was that David "...fetched her to his house, and she became his wife,.."

Your "exampl ...[text shortened]... ct you will respond to this post with more of your convoluted twisting and squirming and deflecting.
Do they teach you American dunces to read across there? Read the very next passage where God sent Nathan the prophet, to speak to David. What did Nathan say? Here is what God told Nathan to say
- God had given David everything, wealth, wives, he lacked nothing
- David saw a mans wife and liked her
- David had sex with the mans wife
- David found out who the husband was
- David arranged with Joab to place him in a spot where he will die
- David then married the mans wife and she had a baby.

Wherefore hast thou despised the commandment of the LORD, to do evil in his sight? thou hast killed Uriah the Hittite with the sword, and hast taken his wife to be thy wife, and hast slain him with the sword of the children of Ammon. (2 Samuel 12:9 KJV)

There is nothing there about God being displeased that David having many wives.

Shut up and go to the back of the class. You are the class dunce.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
I simply can't imagine dead flesh on the menu in heaven.
Mmmm, dead flesh. 😋😋😋