18 Aug '05 19:09>
Just thought I'd move the discussion to a new thread
Originally posted by no1marauder
Let me explain the basic characteristic of Quantum Mechanics that is relevant to this discussion. What QM can do is predict probabilities to unerring accuracy; it has never been proven wrong. As an example, if particle A and B collide, it predicts that 96% of the time particle C will result and 4% of the time particle D will result. Millions of such interactions are observed and they match the predictions of Quantum Mechanics made beforehand as a result of mathematical formulas. But it is impossible to predict that a certain collison between particle A and B will result in particle C or D; we do not know and apparently can not know. The same principle applies to the Laws of Hereditary; we cannot know a particular result for certain but we know the probabilities. Thus, there exist some physical laws that cannot predict an individual outcome. I would think that the application of this observation to something as incredibly complex as human behavior would be obvious - Einstein said "Politics [a particulary confusing form of human behavior] is much harder than physics".
I mentioned one observation that is consistent with Natural Law: that cultures have similar basic moral codes. At its most basic, we can the say a universal moral code would be the "Golden Rule": "do unto others as you would have them do onto you." I would maintain that this is a universally accepted societal premise and one that is conducive to societal stability. Human beings have become the dominant species on the planet due to intraspecies cooperation and empathy; it is unsurprising that our basic moral codes would strongly reflect that characteristic of our nature which has the most survival value. Call it "evolution" if you will.
I'll post some objections in a moment.
Originally posted by no1marauder
Let me explain the basic characteristic of Quantum Mechanics that is relevant to this discussion. What QM can do is predict probabilities to unerring accuracy; it has never been proven wrong. As an example, if particle A and B collide, it predicts that 96% of the time particle C will result and 4% of the time particle D will result. Millions of such interactions are observed and they match the predictions of Quantum Mechanics made beforehand as a result of mathematical formulas. But it is impossible to predict that a certain collison between particle A and B will result in particle C or D; we do not know and apparently can not know. The same principle applies to the Laws of Hereditary; we cannot know a particular result for certain but we know the probabilities. Thus, there exist some physical laws that cannot predict an individual outcome. I would think that the application of this observation to something as incredibly complex as human behavior would be obvious - Einstein said "Politics [a particulary confusing form of human behavior] is much harder than physics".
I mentioned one observation that is consistent with Natural Law: that cultures have similar basic moral codes. At its most basic, we can the say a universal moral code would be the "Golden Rule": "do unto others as you would have them do onto you." I would maintain that this is a universally accepted societal premise and one that is conducive to societal stability. Human beings have become the dominant species on the planet due to intraspecies cooperation and empathy; it is unsurprising that our basic moral codes would strongly reflect that characteristic of our nature which has the most survival value. Call it "evolution" if you will.
I'll post some objections in a moment.