Originally posted by rwingettDon't you believe it, RW. Jesus is just testing your faith in him.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7150627.stm
A key link in the evolution of whales has been discovered. Yet another bit of evidence for evolution. And, yes, you creationists, it is the so called "macro evolution" that you take such exception to.
Originally posted by rwingettThe theory of evolution will continue to evolve and change. 1000 years from now people will laugh at what we believed today.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7150627.stm
A key link in the evolution of whales has been discovered. Yet another bit of evidence for evolution. And, yes, you creationists, it is the so called "macro evolution" that you take such exception to.
Originally posted by rwingettImpressive you think that turned into a whale.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7150627.stm
A key link in the evolution of whales has been discovered. Yet another bit of evidence for evolution. And, yes, you creationists, it is the so called "macro evolution" that you take such exception to.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayYes, he finds a confluence of incontrovertible data which points to a single, logical conclusion
You are a person of strong faith and mighty beliefs.
is the most rational thing into which to base his beliefs rather than unlikely conclusions unsupported
by anything he can observe.
Nemesio
Originally posted by scottishinnzYou see a couple of similar features in a creature that has as much
Yes, he believes readily observable things, backed by evidence, to be true.
You believe a magic man, with no evidence whatsoever, did it.
in common with a deer as anything else if it was really a living
creature at all, and call it a relative to a whale, and this for you is
observable science and evidence. Personally, seeing life and the
balance that we see through the entire universe to support life to me
suggests design, and my personal experiences and that of others I
know also point to God being real, it isn’t without evidence or
witnesses it is just that you have closed your mind to the possibility.
Kelly
Originally posted by NemesioSo if there is a feature in the head that is close to a whale in some
Yes, he finds a confluence of incontrovertible data which points to a single, logical conclusion
is the most rational thing into which to base his beliefs rather than unlikely conclusions unsupported
by anything he can observe.
Nemesio
fashion that is incontrovertible data in your opinion that it must be
related to a whale. Care to buy a bridge cheap?
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJaySeeing is believing. Although I have not seen this particular creature, I can go into any natural history museum across the country and see a plethora of other physical artifacts that have been wrought by evolution. The evidence is right there to be seen. It requires only observation, not faith. In fact, it takes an incredible amount of faith to deny the validity of the evidence.
You are a person of strong faith and mighty beliefs.
Kelly
I don't like the way this was presented. They say it's "THE missing link" when in fact there is no single missing link. There are simply refinements to be made. We'll never have a complete fossil set of every organism who ever lived who was in the ancestral chain of modern whales.
Similarly, this new bit of evidence does not "prove" evolution true. It supports it, that's all.