New manmade enzyme points of life origins:

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am not referring to any made up imaginary time scale of millions and billions of years. I am referring to real time that can be verified.

Even if the universe has existed that long, anyone that believes that all the various parts of a human body could gradually come about over millions and billions of years as well as the interactive systems to sustain ...[text shortened]... kinds and not the gradual appearance as they expected from their foolhardy theory of evolution.

Here's an approximate timescale as we understand it today:

4.5 billion years ago - earth formed
3.7+ billion years ago - first life forms
2.5 billion years ago - eukaryotes appear (first multicellular organisms)
540-480 million years ago - the cambrian explosion which saw ever more complex variants of multi-cellular forms
225 million years ago - first mammals appear
6 million years ago - first hominids appear
200,000 years ago - modern humans appear

These numbers are approximate (I can't be arsed to look the current numbers up), and these numbers are adjusted as new evidence appear, but they're not gonna change to 6000 years as through some magic. You'd need a really good explanation from geology, astronomy, physics, genetics and a whole host of specialised fields, to explain away all this. It's not enough to say you don't believe it, or you know of some problems with dating methods (that scientists detected and accounted for). Show us how they're wrong. And no, I'm not asking for another propaganda video trying to attack established science, but evidence that everything we know about the world today fits within a 6,000 year old universe. Until creationist scientists produce a falsifiable model explaining how all the evidence fits within a six thousand year old universe, your objections amount to nothing but loud talk.

Originally posted by C Hess
Here's an approximate timescale as we understand it today:

4.5 billion years ago - earth formed
3.7+ billion years ago - first life forms
2.5 billion years ago - eukaryotes appear (first multicellular organisms)
540-480 million years ago - the cambrian explosion which saw ever more complex variants of multi-cellular forms
225 million years ago - first ...[text shortened]... e fits within a six thousand year old universe, your objections amount to nothing but loud talk.

I guess you exempt the evolution boys from explaining how all the evidence fits within their imaginary time frame that never happened. Let me tell you in advance, it don't fit and never well because it did not happen the way they imagined it to happen. My video references proved that. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
I guess you exempt the evolution boys from explaining how all the evidence fits within their imaginary time frame that never happened. Let me tell you in advance, it don't fit and never well because it did not happen the way they imagined it to happen. My video references proved that. 😏

It does fit the timescale, and your videos prove nothing whatsoever. They contain only arguments from ignorance.

Originally posted by C Hess
It does fit the timescale, and your videos prove nothing whatsoever. They contain only arguments from ignorance.

Don't you get that the billions of years timescale is imaginary, that is, it never happened.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Don't you get that the billions of years timescale is imaginary, that is, it never happened.

Only in your self lobotomized deeply programmed what is left of your so-called mind.

All you try to do, quite unsuccessfully in fact, is your vain attempt to tear down a whole set of sciences that refutes your biblical fairy tales. You are not even CLOSE to being interested in actual truth, only the fake 'truth' you proclaim and 'prove' with asssinine political based anti science videos after votes, not truth.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Only in your self lobotomized deeply programmed what is left of your so-called mind.

All you try to do, quite unsuccessfully in fact, is your vain attempt to tear down a whole set of sciences that refutes your biblical fairy tales. You are not even CLOSE to being interested in actual truth, only the fake 'truth' you proclaim and 'prove' with asssinine political based anti science videos after votes, not truth.

The evolution theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition in schools for the minds of the children.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The evolution theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition in schools for the minds of the children.

No, it is the other way round, creationism is the fragile branch, swaying in the wind and due to fall down any time now. Meanwhile evolution is still taught all around the world and no ending of THAT in sight, much as you hate it. Hey, in another 20 years or so, you won't even care one way or the other. For which we can all be thankful, one less nutter to worry about.

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-scientists-enzyme-life.

Getting closer to the explanation of the origin of life creationists hate.

This reminds me of those articles you see every now and then stating that someone is on the verge of discovering Noah's Ark.

Originally posted by sonhouse
No, it is the other way round, creationism is the fragile branch, swaying in the wind and due to fall down any time now. Meanwhile evolution is still taught all around the world and no ending of THAT in sight, much as you hate it. Hey, in another 20 years or so, you won't even care one way or the other. For which we can all be thankful, one less nutter to worry about.

Creation is believed all around the world and no end of that in sight. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
The evolution theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition in schools for the minds of the children.

The round earth theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

The heliocentric theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

The germ theory of disease is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

Originally posted by C Hess
The round earth theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

The heliocentric theory is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

The germ theory of disease is so fragile the atheists can not allow any competition for the minds of the children.

The discovery of DNA programming information has already disproved Darwinian evolution, but some of you are either too stupid or stubborn to admit it. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
The discovery of DNA programming information has already disproved Darwinian evolution, but some of you are either too stupid or stubborn to admit it. 😏

Clinging to your desperation. Fortunately REAL people know what's going on. You are not one of them.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The discovery of DNA programming information has already disproved Darwinian evolution, but some of you are either too stupid or stubborn to admit it. 😏

No, again, DNA "programming" is not some incredible, in natural terms unexplicable phenomenon under which evolutionary theory crumbles. I'm sorry, but you repeating that statement won't change that. It's not that we're too stupid or stubborn to see it your way, it's that we understand perfectly what you're trying to say and history has taught us that statements like: "It's so complex, therefore there has to be an intelligence behind it", invariably fails. There's always a natural explanation waiting around the corner.

Originally posted by C Hess
No, again, DNA "programming" is not some incredible, in natural terms unexplicable phenomenon under which evolutionary theory crumbles. I'm sorry, but you repeating that statement won't change that. It's not that we're too stupid or stubborn to see it your way, it's that we understand perfectly what you're trying to say and history has taught us that statemen ...[text shortened]... nd it", invariably fails. There's always a natural explanation waiting around the corner.

The most logical and reasonable explanation is that God did it. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
The most logical and reasonable explanation is that God did it. 😏

Now you are using logic? When did THAT happen? Goddidit is your usual answer.