Nipple Challenge: Evolution v. Creationism

Originally posted by Halitose
Why? What would be the evolutionist's claim?

Did males evolve (devolve) from females? Did ancestral males suckle the young? Ludicrous.

According to the TEO, male/female differentiation happened (evolved) much earlier than when mammals evolved from reptiles. There were already males and females long before females evolved breast-feeding.

This would ...[text shortened]... ss all knowledge of the Creator’s intentions, which has never been a claim of creation theory.

What a doofus.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
What a doofus.

Thanks. Care to refute any of my statements?

Originally posted by Halitose
Thanks. Care to refute any of my statements?

According to Scribbles-logic, he already has. Refutation by sarcasm!

EDIT: I think we should call it the 'Johnson-Scribbles Method' - I say you're an idiot; I refute you thus!

Originally posted by lucifershammer
According to Scribbles-logic, he already has. Refutation by sarcasm!

I'm sure it's just a shot across the bow while he scrambles his rebuttal. 😀

Originally posted by lucifershammer
EDIT: I think we should call it the 'Johnson-Scribbles Method' - I say you're an idiot; I refute you thus!

Or as DavidC prefers: argumentum ad megasmugness.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
What a doofus.

Also, what would David Hasselhoff look like without nipples? Sad, very sad.

Here is a theory that could be ported by a creationist -

Man has nipples because God's original design was human in his own image - he is, in a sense, a child bearer. When he chose to rip Eve from Adam's body (ribs) - eve was formed of man's basic shape, which included nipples - however, God chose to grant the female the gift of child bearing and rearing, thus gave her the mammory glands to do so. The male nipples remain, as that was part of God's original design.

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Here is a theory that could be ported by a creationist -

Man has nipples because God's original design was human in his own image - he is, in a sense, a child bearer. When he chose to rip Eve from Adam's body (ribs) - eve was formed of man's basic shape, which included nipples - however, God chose to grant the female the gift of child bearing and rear ...[text shortened]... mammory glands to do so. The male nipples remain, as that was part of God's original design.

So God has nipples. Interesting.

Originally posted by Will Everitt
So God has nipples. Interesting.

Mormonism is infectious... 🙂

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Without going into lots of detail - Maybe man nipples are like the appendix - they used to serve some purpose (what? I don't know), but are no longer needed by the male body....

Not exactly, more of a developmental thing. Human embryos are all created equal, and female. It's only during development that male embryos are masculinised by a rush of testosterone, that changes a whole host of things, it turns the organ that will become the cliteros into a penis and it changes the brain architecture.

In females Oestrogen is the great developer, but it's affects are more felt during puberty. At puberty, males receive more testosterone and females more oestrogen which develops our bodies and minds into fully developed, lovely individuals that we are!

So, to sum up, male nipples are a reminder of our uterine trans-genderal experience.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Explain the seemingly paradoxical fact that men have nipples. Base your analysis on the principles of either evolution or creationism.

So that the creators of nipple rings have a market and thus don't turn to a life of crime to support their families. All part of God's plan to keep those families safe and fed.

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Is the challenge too difficult for everybody so far?

Do you have a problem with having nipples? Have you spoken to anyone about these issues? I wonder what Freud would say about your nipple problems?

Originally posted by Coletti
Do you have a problem with having nipples? Have you spoken to anyone about these issues? I wonder what Freud would say about your nipple problems?

Oh, greetings Coletti the Wise, Embassador of Christian Logic. Surely this topic has been discussed on your board. What do the sages over there say on the matter?

Originally posted by reader1107
So that the creators of nipple rings have a market and thus don't turn to a life of crime to support their families. All part of God's plan to keep those families safe and fed.

Sorry, but this makes no sense. If men never had nipples, male nipple rings would never have existed, there would be no niche market and no people trying to sell them.

Or, perhaps you are suggesting that all the criminals currently in circulation are simply male tampon retailers, out of business because men don't require tampons?

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Oh, greetings Coletti the Wise, Embassador of Christian Logic. Surely this topic has been discussed on your board. What do the sages over there say on the matter?

The belly-button issue has reared it's ugly head on occasion, but never the nipple.