Originally posted by @fmf No. I was talking to you about your claims about "an objective morality". Couldn't you discern that? I wasn't interested in the way you try to go about portraying your torturer god notion as anything other than monstrous ~ or, indeed, the way divegeester seeks to rebut it.
I could discern your question and I answered it. What more do you want? Do you want me to give you my rationale as to why I believe an objective moral standard exists? If so all you needed to do was ask.
Originally posted by @dj2becker I could discern your question and I answered it.
Well, for all your discernment, you answered in the negative. And then, later, when pressed, because it didn't fit with stuff you'd said before, you answered in the affirmative. It's fine by me. It's not the first time you've got into a tangle.
Originally posted by @fmf Well, for all your discernment, you answered in the negative. And then, later, when pressed, because it didn't fit with stuff you'd said before, you answered in the affirmative. It's fine by me. It's not the first time you've got into a tangle.
Originally posted by @dj2becker That's because your question was ambiguous.
No. I think the issue was that you bending over backwards to equivocate in the face of clear questions from me, so that later ~ now, for example ~ you could loll about wittering on about how you were misunderstood - or something was unclear - or you can't remember getting an answer - or somesuch.
Originally posted by @fmf No. I think the issue was that you bending over backwards to equivocate in the face of clear questions from me, so that later ~ now, for example ~ you could loll about wittering on about how you were misunderstood - or something was unclear - or you can't remember getting an answer - or somesuch.
Obedience vs Disobedience
07 Sep '17 14:54
Back to Top