09 Nov '10 06:54>
Some christians believe that a scientific theory is less credible because it has the word 'theory' connected with it. The often say that "Well it's only a theory, nothing more." or "It's nothing more than a mere guessing."
They usually say this when we're discussing the 'the Evolution theory', but sometimes also 'the BigBang theory'. Strange enough, never when we talk about 'the Atomic Theory', or 'Number Theory' as guessings or lesser credible. Why is this?
When we talk about science, we walk on the science domain. Scientists define words to be precise. Words are often used in another way in the 'civil life', but shouldn't be confused with the precise scientific meaning. When others try to redefine scientific words, then they do it with an agenda, they are dishonest.
There are some example of terms used in mathematics which might cause confusion for the non-mathematics. But they don't. Like "Rational vs irrational numbers, like the irrationals are beyond ration. Even imaginary numbers are used in a very unimaginary way. And of course many theories, like integration theory, that has nothing to do with guessings. This is not a problem to anyone. Because these theories can equally be hold as truths, even by creationists.
There are two theories in the air. The Evolution theory, and the Creation theory. One is scientific, one is religious. You know which is which. Some believe in one of them, some believe in the other. Some believes in one of them because of religious faith, some believs in the other because of scientific reasons. Some want to pick fights over this, some thinks it doesn't matter.
Often when we discuss Evolution theory vs Creation theory it strikes me hard that creationists doesn't know much about evolution, yet having very strong feelings against it. They think that "If the Evolutionists cannot explain everything, thený don't know anything." Also "If they don't know how a dead molecule turns into a living molecule they don't know anything. We, the Creationists, know." By this they are forcisng evolutionists to explain things that is not a part of the Evolution at all. Like if I ask a christian "If you don't know the hair colour of God, then he cannot exist." or something equally stupid.
Do evolutionists know equally less about the Creation theory? I don't think so. After all, there are a few chapters about it in the Genesis, nothing more. It's all there. It doesn't say anything about DNA and RNA, it doesn't say anything about differentiation over time. It doesn't say anything about fossilisation. I short, it doesn't say much. So the Creation theory is a very simple theory. The Evolution theory is harder to grasp (even if its basis is explainable even to children), and that's might be the explanation why creationists don't know much about it.
Trying to redefine scientific words, trying to include questions outside the theory at hand to prove its faultyness, avoiding to learn about the things being discussed and their non-knowledge in the matters are promoted to Truths, are all dirty tricks. Avoid dirty tricks if you want to debate seriously. If you don't want to debate seriously, then it shows your own opinions as weak.
They usually say this when we're discussing the 'the Evolution theory', but sometimes also 'the BigBang theory'. Strange enough, never when we talk about 'the Atomic Theory', or 'Number Theory' as guessings or lesser credible. Why is this?
When we talk about science, we walk on the science domain. Scientists define words to be precise. Words are often used in another way in the 'civil life', but shouldn't be confused with the precise scientific meaning. When others try to redefine scientific words, then they do it with an agenda, they are dishonest.
There are some example of terms used in mathematics which might cause confusion for the non-mathematics. But they don't. Like "Rational vs irrational numbers, like the irrationals are beyond ration. Even imaginary numbers are used in a very unimaginary way. And of course many theories, like integration theory, that has nothing to do with guessings. This is not a problem to anyone. Because these theories can equally be hold as truths, even by creationists.
There are two theories in the air. The Evolution theory, and the Creation theory. One is scientific, one is religious. You know which is which. Some believe in one of them, some believe in the other. Some believes in one of them because of religious faith, some believs in the other because of scientific reasons. Some want to pick fights over this, some thinks it doesn't matter.
Often when we discuss Evolution theory vs Creation theory it strikes me hard that creationists doesn't know much about evolution, yet having very strong feelings against it. They think that "If the Evolutionists cannot explain everything, thený don't know anything." Also "If they don't know how a dead molecule turns into a living molecule they don't know anything. We, the Creationists, know." By this they are forcisng evolutionists to explain things that is not a part of the Evolution at all. Like if I ask a christian "If you don't know the hair colour of God, then he cannot exist." or something equally stupid.
Do evolutionists know equally less about the Creation theory? I don't think so. After all, there are a few chapters about it in the Genesis, nothing more. It's all there. It doesn't say anything about DNA and RNA, it doesn't say anything about differentiation over time. It doesn't say anything about fossilisation. I short, it doesn't say much. So the Creation theory is a very simple theory. The Evolution theory is harder to grasp (even if its basis is explainable even to children), and that's might be the explanation why creationists don't know much about it.
Trying to redefine scientific words, trying to include questions outside the theory at hand to prove its faultyness, avoiding to learn about the things being discussed and their non-knowledge in the matters are promoted to Truths, are all dirty tricks. Avoid dirty tricks if you want to debate seriously. If you don't want to debate seriously, then it shows your own opinions as weak.