Go back
On the Attribution of Value to Dust

On the Attribution of Value to Dust

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
I would ask, as a topic of discussion and as a means of exploring the fundamental question of the origin of the concept relative to the idea of the "attribution of value" to the "nature of life" as "precious", upon what basis or premise is that assertion made?
Each person makes their own call on these matters. It all boils down to each individual's unique permutation of "nature" and "nurture".

"Nature" is your character and identity. "Nurture" is all that is absorbed from your human environment and all that you experience, as seen through the prism of your "nurture".

For example, your religious beliefs are part of your "nurture" just as my religious beliefs in the past are part of my "nurture".

So, each person - like you and me - makes their own call on what is value, nature and preciousness in terms of our lives.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
upon what premise do humans base an attribution of value on life, since we are merely here today and gone tomorrow?
I don't see how the one's belief that we are "merely here today and gone tomorrow" [i.e. our existence is finite"] affects the fact that humans attribute value to our own lives and the lives of others.

Many people attribute value to their own lives and the lives of others by way of religious perspectives and beliefs regarding everlasting life, but I don't see how our finite existence has any bearing on on this, just as their assertions about everlasting life don't have any bearing on my beliefs regarding our finite existence.

Either way, people have the capacity and need to attribute value to life, and won't always see eye to eye about why it is so and what it's for.


On the Attribution of Value to Dust

The "attribution of value", as you well know, is not "to dust", but instead to the minds and feelings and life stories and opinions and beliefs and personalities and identitities and unique human spirits of your fellow human beings.

You want to refer to all that as "dust"?

That's your prerogative.

1 edit

@secondson said
Those are two separate questions. The first asks about the physical body. The second infers there's more to humans than just the physical body.

In either case the answer is essentially the same. At least to the atheist I would think.

Humans are physically made of the same "stuff" as everything else in existence. We come from dust, and that's what we go back to when t ...[text shortened]... se do humans base an attribution of value on life, since we are merely here today and gone tomorrow?
Humans do 'not' come from dust. That is a childlike oversimplification. It's not even a given that the origin of life comes from this planet. (For example, the role of meteorites etc in bringing life to Earth).

Humans have evolved to a state where they (for the most part) value life, even its continuation after we have gone. This is to be celebrated.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
One can say life is precious, but that assumes everything is going well with them. Many others would not share that same attribution of value because their life circumstances would be anything but precious.
"Preciousness" is in the eye of the beholder. I've met plenty of people whose lives have not always been "going well" who, nevertheless, found the opportunities that life offers them ~ to learn, to teach, to share, to love, to make others happy, to affect the future, and so on ~ to be precious.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Humans do 'not' come from dust. That is a childlike oversimplification. It's not even a given that the origin of life comes from this planet. (For example, the role of meteorites etc in bringing life to Earth).

Humans have evolved to a state where they (for the most part) value life, even its continuation after we have gone. This is to be celebrated.
You don't have have any idea where life came from. The value your placing on life is a very temporary one, much like a fireworks display in progress. We oooh and ahh with each flash of light then quickly look at the next one as the older one fades away.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
The value your placing on life is a very temporary one, much like a fireworks display in progress. We oooh and ahh with each flash of light then quickly look at the next one as the older one fades away.
Life is temporary, but I think the "fireworks display" analogy is weak.

Yes. Life is temporary - finite - and we all place value on it - our own lives and the lives of others - even if some of us think life is everlasting and not temporary.

If you believe that life is like a "fireworks display" that somehow goes on and on and on without end, and if that 'endlessness' has something to do with how you place value on life, then that is your prerogative.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
You don't have have any idea where life came from. The value your placing on life is a very temporary one, much like a fireworks display in progress. We oooh and ahh with each flash of light then quickly look at the next one as the older one fades away.
I know life didn't come from God. He is a rocket with no bang. (Just a disappointing fizz).

Vote Up
Vote Down

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I know life didn't come from God. He is a rocket with no bang. (Just a disappointing fizz).
You hope and believe that it is true; there is a difference between knowing and believing.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
You hope and believe that it is true; there is a difference between knowing and believing.
If you think I 'hope' that is true then you fail miserably to understand atheism.

I know God doesn't exist. You believe He does. - Hope sits in your camp, not mine.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
If you think I 'hope' that is true then you fail miserably to understand atheism.

I know God doesn't exist. You believe He does. - Hope sits in your camp, not mine.
I'm not talking about Atheism, and I'm not commenting on Atheism. I'm saying you don't have a clue about life's beginning, there is nothing to hang your hat on concerning the origin of life. There isn't a 'truth' you can confirm even to argue over to suggest you know how it began. So your claims, any claims you care to make, have nothing to do with truth or facts. All of your beliefs about its beginnings are all found in one place between your ears.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
If you think I 'hope' that is true then you fail miserably to understand atheism.

I know God doesn't exist. You believe He does. - Hope sits in your camp, not mine.
I knew there is no hope in your camp, and there is in mine nothing new there either.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I'm not talking about Atheism, and I'm not commenting on Atheism.
Why are you capitalizing the common noun 'atheism'?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I knew there is no hope in your camp, and there is in mine nothing new there either.
Does the fact that you hope you will have everlasting life - and Ghost of a Duke has no use for such a hope - mean, to your way of thinking, you are able to attribute value to human life and he is not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kellyjay said
I knew there is no hope in your camp, and there is in mine nothing new there either.
That you would think an atheist (such as myself) 'hopes' God doesn't exist demonstrates you have no idea what you are talking about.

God off the table, my life is full of hope. More than yours I wager.