Go back
Once saved, Always saved ?

Once saved, Always saved ?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

I know, I know--it's like the old "do we jave free will, or is God all-knowing and we're just robots" argument. Been done to death. Still, I recently heard the best argument ever in favor of the premise:

Since God promised "eternal" life to believers, then to take that away from one who backslides, falls away, or whatever term you choose for not living up to an ideal, doesn't that refute the whole meaning of "eternal"? And since God does not lie, eternal life must BE truly eternal, right?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
I know, I know--it's like the old "do we jave free will, or is God all-knowing and we're just robots" argument. Been done to death. Still, I recently heard the best argument ever in favor of the premise:

Since God promised "eternal" life to believers, then to take that away from one who backslides, falls away, or whatever term you choose for not liv ...[text shortened]... g of "eternal"? And since God does not lie, eternal life must BE truly eternal, right?
In the context of evangelical salvation, no.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
I know, I know--it's like the old "do we jave free will, or is God all-knowing and we're just robots" argument. Been done to death. Still, I recently heard the best argument ever in favor of the premise:

Since God promised "eternal" life to believers, then to take that away from one who backslides, falls away, or whatever term you choose for not liv ...[text shortened]... g of "eternal"? And since God does not lie, eternal life must BE truly eternal, right?
What constitutes "belief"?

Can one truly "believe" and later fall away?

Can one truly "believe" and continue to sin?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne


Can one truly "believe" and later fall away?
Of course, if one employs an epistemically sound notion of belief.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne

Can one truly "believe" and continue to sin?
Don't all people sin? If the answer to your question were No, that would imply there are no believers.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Don't all people sin? If the answer to your question were No, that would imply there are no believers.
Do they? Even if you answer "yes", does that negate the question?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Of course, if one employs an epistemically sound notion of belief.
What if one employs a Jesusically sound notion of belief?

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

A person who continues in sin without a hint of repentance and has no good works to speak of, yet believes Christ is his savior, has not yet received grace. Whereas, a person who periodically falls into sin (and consistently repents of that sin) yet shows forth good works, has received grace.

There is no such thing as a sinless person, whether saint or sinner. Grace is not dependent on our merit, either before or after a person receives grace. And all those who receive grace never lose it.

To say that a person can lose it by continuing in sin without repentance is to misconstrue what is revealed, since only those who haven't yet received grace are able to continue in sin without repentance. Therefore, when someone continues in sin without a hint of repentance this only proves that that person has not yet received grace -- what it does not prove is that grace can be lost once it is received.

Fire is not hot in order that it may burn, but because it burns. A wheel does not run nicely in order that it may be round, but because it is round. So no one does good works in order that he may receive grace, but because he has received grace." - St. Augustine

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
What if one employs a Jesusically sound notion of belief?
Well, I don't know what characterizes such a theory of belief. Is it epistemically sound?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Well, I don't know what characterizes such a theory of belief. Is it epistemically sound?
The term was kind of a gag, but it seems to me that the meaning of the word "believe" can change with the speaker and/or topic. For instance one man may say he believes in fidelity in marriage meaning with an unshakable commitment. Another man may say he believes in fidelity in marriage meaning as a general idea which he may suspend should he find a willing partner that he finds sufficiently attractive.

When exploring the idea being 'saved' in Christianity, it seems prudent to try to assess what Jesus meant by 'believe'

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
Another man may say he believes in fidelity in marriage meaning as a general idea which he may suspend should he find a willing partner that he finds sufficiently attractive.
This is not belief in fidelity in marriage, plain and simple.

Nemesio

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nemesio
This is not belief in fidelity in marriage, plain and simple.

Nemesio
I don't think so either, but there are many who would insist that that's what they "believe" nevertheless.

Just as there are many who insist they "believe" in Jesus and call him "Lord", but don't do what he says.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by epiphinehas
"So no one does good works in order that he may receive grace, but because he has received grace." - St. Augustine
Do you think St. Augustine was right, that those who have not received grace do not do good works?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by epiphinehas
A person who continues in sin without a hint of repentance and has no good works to speak of, yet believes Christ is his savior, has not yet received grace. Whereas, a person who periodically falls into sin (and consistently repents of that sin) yet shows forth good works, has received grace.

There is no such thing as a sinless person, whether ...[text shortened]... ks in order that he may receive grace, but because he has received grace.[/i]" - St. Augustine
But I thought we receive grace first-- You know, "not by works, lest anyone should boast"? As I understand salvation, we are saved through grace ALONE--no works, no promises to be good, no walking the aisle or getting dipped in water, no nothin'. Thus, works can't be, in ANY way, a requirement to salvation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PinkFloyd
Thus, works can't be, in ANY way, a requirement to salvation.
Right. They are merely the outward manifestation of the inward transformation. No works =
no salvation.

Nemesio

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.