Go back
Only one option.....

Only one option.....

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yawn, so there has occurred no transmutation of ones species or genus into another,
thank you, its all you had to say, I agree, filtering out the non essentials of your posts
really is a crashing bore.
Yes, nothing that disproves evolution, including transmutation of one species into another,
has ever been observed.

You really need an education, the one you have is evidently defective.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Yes, nothing that disproves evolution, including transmutation of one species into another,
has ever been observed.

You really need an education, the one you have is evidently defective.
thankyou this was exactly my point, no empirical scientific evidence for the
transmutation of one species into another, once again you demonstrate a rather
peculiar propensity for posting the obvious, is it a gift or is it cultivated?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
thankyou this was exactly my point, no empirical scientific evidence for the
transmutation of one species into another
And you apparently are incapable of answering the simple question:
are dogs descended from wolves?

Now let me pose a harder one:
what species is a cross breed between a dog and a wolf?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
thankyou this was exactly my point, no empirical scientific evidence for the
transmutation of one species into another, once again you demonstrate a rather
peculiar propensity for posting the obvious, is it a gift or is it cultivated?
Once again you demonstrate a particular propensity for posting the stupid, is it a gift
or is it cultivated?

Your point was that no evidence has been found for transmutation and that thus
evolution is unproven. Which is ignorant, idiotic, and wrong.

My point, which you are either deliberately ignoring or are too stupid to pick up, is that
transmutation isn't predicted by evolutionary theory and that in fact if it were to be
observed this would be evidence against evolution.
And that you are quite right in stating that it hasn't been observed, and neither has
anything else that would disprove evolution.
Thus with the mountains of proof for evolution (adaptation to the environment which
is evolution and you admit happens) and absolutely no evidence against it (again which
you just admitted) evolution is the only and best explanation for the diversity of life on
the planet.

Your posts on evolution seem to consist entirely of ad hominems, straw man fallacies,
ad populums, ignorance, lies, and nonsense... You are either deluded and ignorant on
the subject, or wilfully deceitful, neither is good.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
your empirical scientific evidence for the transmutation of one species or genus into
another, if you please, or are we to assume that all things were created according to
their kinds as the Biblical record states.
Here's a start -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_cetaceans

http://www.talkorigins.org/features/whales/

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
Once again you demonstrate a particular propensity for posting the stupid, is it a gift
or is it cultivated?

Your point was that no evidence has been found for transmutation and that thus
evolution is unproven. Which is ignorant, idiotic, and wrong.

My point, which you are either deliberately ignoring or are too stupid to pick up, is that
tra You are either deluded and ignorant on
the subject, or wilfully deceitful, neither is good.
yawn! such a crashing bore.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Here's a start -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_cetaceans

http://www.talkorigins.org/features/whales/
but your friend states that there is no empirical evidence for the transmutation of one
species to another, are you disagreeing with him?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
but your friend states that there is no empirical evidence for the transmutation of one
species to another, are you disagreeing with him?
His contesting your use of the word 'transmutation'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmutation_of_species

The theory of transmutation went out of fashion in the Victorian era.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
His contesting your use of the word 'transmutation'.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmutation_of_species
meh, among other things, he seems rather, how can i say, contentious.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
meh, among other things, he seems rather, how can i say, contentious.
Now, what points would you like to discuss in the articles i linked?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Now, what points would you like to discuss in the articles i linked?
none, i am filing my tax return, my partnership return and doing my accounts, its
rather busy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
none, i am filing my tax return, my partnership return and doing my accounts, its
rather busy.
Surprise, surprise.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Surprise, surprise.
yes even filing ones tax return can be more interesting than remonstrating with materialists! 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
oh right, we should believe the cosmos was created by a thousand-headed monstrosity.
and this beast gave birth to the 4 classes of hindu society. -- one each from its mouths, eyes, thighs and feet.

or wait, there's another one...

first the world was nonexistent, then it came into existence, then it turned into an egg, then egg broke and the silver ...[text shortened]... and absurd things in the vedic mythos, but i seriously doubt i need to list any more of them.
You get your information second hand from web-sites not authorized.

You do not understand fact from mythology.

You read a tiny little bit of something on-line from an un-authorized web sites and you understand nothing.............and from all that you reject the Vedas.

You are simply making baseless and whimsical comments.

And for approaching the Vedas in this manner you are dishonest.

You should not come to the spirituality forum unless you become honest and sensible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Dasa
You should not come to the spirituality forum unless you become honest and sensible.
So what are you doing here?