1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI'm sorry but you belong to an organistaion that pushes this propoganda through peoples doors around the world and you can't even bring yrouself to make a comment on the literature you distribute. I find the fact that you don't wish to talk about it stange to the extreme. Having debated with you over the years you normally don't wish to talk about something when you have some sort of internal conflict going on. It's quite obvious you think the claim that masturbation can lead to homosexuality as absurd as everybody else. But of course you daren't question the 'collective' so you just sweep it under the carpet.
yes i hope so, there are only so many times i wish to say, i dont want to discuss it, until the penny finally drops.
The article hasn't been taken out of context, not at all. I've found a different article which makes the same claim. It deserves a thread all of it's own.
We can try one last time, do you agree with the statement, yay or nay?
Originally posted by Proper Knobpush propaganda, look PK, i am not going to fall out with you over this, you have not
I'm sorry but you belong to an organistaion that pushes this propoganda through peoples doors around the world and you can't even bring yrouself to make a comment on the literature you distribute. I find the fact that you don't wish to talk about it stange to the extreme. Having debated with you over the years you normally don't wish to talk about someth ...[text shortened]... a different article which makes the same claim. It deserves a thread all of it's own.
read the full article, have you, and thus any comments that you make are based on
partial knowledge at best, you have no way of knowing what the article was getting at
but seem fit to continue to make assertions based on your partial knowledge of the
circumstances, I dont think masturbation is an appropriate topic, Raj does, discuss it
with him, he wants to discuss it, i dont.
(Philippians 4:8) . . .Finally, brothers, whatever things are true, whatever things are
of serious concern, whatever things are righteous, whatever things are chaste,
whatever things are lovable, whatever things are well spoken of, whatever virtue
there is and whatever praiseworthy thing there is, continue considering these things.
I dont think the topic considers any of these ideals, so i will not discuss it, end of.
Originally posted by Proper KnobI very rarely give literature, in fact, i have even asked for it back when i felt the
He spends x amount of hours each week dsitributing this literature and can't even answer a single question about the content of an article.
recipient was less than worthy!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat deosn't negate the fact that your organisation distributes the most widely published magazine in the world. Some of your memebers do just churn it out, i know they do as i've had it delivered through my letterbox.
I very rarely give literature, in fact, i have even asked for it back when i felt the
recipient was less than worthy!
Now, the article has been pasted in the forum. Could you tell me how the statement has been taken out of conetxt, and secondly whether you agree with it or not. No discussion, a simple yes or no. I've highlighted the section for you in bold.
Originally posted by Proper KnobThat deosn't negate the fact that your organisation distributes the most widely published magazine in the world
That deosn't negate the fact that your organisation distributes the most widely published magazine in the world. Some of your memebers do just churn it out, i know they do as i've had it delivered through my letterbox.
Now, the article has been pasted in the forum. Could you tell me how the statement has been taken out of conetxt, and secondly whether ...[text shortened]... h it or not. No discussion, a simple yes or no. I've highlighted the section for you in bold.
yes we are rather awesome, i admit it!
as for any comments, i have not read the full article.