Originally posted by FreakyKBH
For not assuming 'that,' you still draw conclusions which rely on 'that.' Just because we are not able to observe the sin nature in the cell structure doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Such shortsightedness is what keeps knowledge at bay and people in darkness.
If I were making the assumption, all of my thinking would be based upon faith in the scientifi ...[text shortened]... uage perspicuous for a contemporary reader. With what part did you have the most trouble?
But you can't observe 'sin nature' anywhere. Why assume it's part of the cell? Why not
part of the soul (something else we cannot observe)? Or perhaps part of the psyche?
You assert it belongs in the cell, but you admit you can't show it. So, what you meant to
say was 'I believe (or my faith tells me) that sin nature resides in the cell.'
I understand the Biblical presentation. Assuming for a moment that the Biblical explanation
is necessarily true (I'm willing to play ball), there is no reason to believe that it has anything
whatsoever to do with cells. Sin nature could just as easily (or perhaps more easily) be
something utterly apart from the corporeal, just as the soul is.
The only part 'with which I had trouble' was (yet another of) your bald assertions that give
a pseudo-scientific understanding of things pertaining to faith. I know
why you do it: to give
yourself the illusion of credibility (just like your disastrous foray into philosophy). Sadly, you are
no longer the medium-sized fish in the very, very small pond.
Nemesio