Not to be confused with the araneomorph spiders. Opiliones are found in ancient fossils, relatively unchanged in apparent body makeup for thousands of thousands of generations. There are of course inestimable species changing or evolving along micro-level environmental constraints. No, evidence hasn't found sea bottom that aliens are targeting these arachnids. Although a sampling of data at least is arriving about its macrobehavior. A study conducted a care versus a no care model for parent sexes looking after offspring. It turned out female care came from no parental care, and either paternal or maternal guarding of eggs was through female care, suggesting a complex line of negligence and reemergence. Drop any conjecture...
@Oblation-Ants saidHi, I’m not sure what you’re getting at here between ancient fossils, aliens, care or no care with the father or mother protection of spider eggs, snd spirituality.
Not to be confused with the araneomorph spiders. Opiliones are found in ancient fossils, relatively unchanged in apparent body makeup for thousands of thousands of generations. There are of course inestimable species changing or evolving along micro-level environmental constraints. No, evidence hasn't found sea bottom that aliens are targeting these arachnids. Although ...[text shortened]... through female care, suggesting a complex line of negligence and reemergence. Drop any conjecture...
@mike69
As these long-legged creatures do not make webs, they're not technically a spider. We're also putting stock in one set of ideas over another. Bugs can show occasional investment in protective care, superseding other factors. Small, incremental genetics do not always make the adaptation. The joke is all the seriousness of Men in Black; except are male opiliones largely, systematically rewarded for their efforts?
@Oblation-Ants saidCorrect, no they are not a spider, and their closest relative in the scorpion. I like to mess with the way they communicate. Put your finger tips on the surface in front of them like another spider(for ease of understanding) and move straight up and down like bouncing not lifting fingertips. This is their warning they will do it back. Lift different fingers up and down crossing over one another and back, this is how they communicate with certain movements. This is called not enough people to talk with, 😂😂😂 and I don’t get the joke or why here?
@mike69
As these long-legged creatures do not make webs, they're not technically a spider. We're also putting stock in one set of ideas over another. Bugs can show occasional investment in protective care, superseding other factors. Small, incremental genetics do not always make the adaptation. The joke is all the seriousness of Men in Black; except are male opiliones largely, systematically rewarded for their efforts?
Other strategies include hiding or burying eggs. Since females leave a mucus to cover them, attempt is usually performed in advance to protect. The citizen study seems to investigate egg attendance after nest selection. Months and months incubating is possible. Mothering assumes more feeding stressor signals, while fathering sacrifices for the harvests. Sniffing in, it probably serves a purpose of stability, different than innate survival or self-conditioning.
Albeit cursory research, I don't observe fang pinchers or secretion mechanisms growing out of a freakish genetic mutation modifying the nature of lost appendages. Do the cues transferred by each parent's expression during nurture (both participate among foreign inputs) toward the larvae disposition potentially build up enough deviation/nursing capacity?
@Oblation-Ants saidSo they are the same in design from past, present, and into the future. Define these cues and with an example of foreign inputs?
Albeit cursory research, I don't observe fang pinchers or secretion mechanisms growing out of a freakish genetic mutation modifying the nature of lost appendages. Do the cues transferred by each parent's expression during nurture (both participate among foreign inputs) toward the larvae disposition potentially build up enough deviation/nursing capacity?
On another note have you noticed the infinity sign popping up a lot in shows, and just generally around like waking up at 3am for a time??? It’s just strange 🤯.
@
I was up at 4am, just clearing my mind, putting together a montage elsewhere. I believe the life power of early forms, the essence which maybe emanated before, but the subcreators partially share artistic license. This isn't scientifically defined – yet let me work on it.
The Cambrian explosion has the earliest supposed chelicera, in a short spate. We can infer other factors were tagteaming and playing into the design dynamics.
It was cheesy meatball 4am. The scientists leave it at chance, like quantum ideas, that the environment controls basic evolution and holds fast to genetic order. So, part of the "design" features carry into future organisms. Certain experts speak on memories stored within the hierarchy of species, developing from specified prototype. An intelligent detail pervades, or details, contributing this 'transition' power.
It's easy until you consider embryos have all kinds of differentiation. Did the new egg-carrying animal [entity] duplicate its gene function which produced a thrice-segmented arm, or leave out genes and cause vestigial modified [skin] lids, or altogether something happens as defective... Would other forces of consciousness be so driven, capable with even undergrown silksac, thru a primitive caretaking?
Take social teaching, which may be good applying here, about how an individual assesses relative needs and awareness. We can know the feeling – an open portal but if we don't take it closes up. The biological science notwithstanding, we take what is needed that another doesn't need, what can reasonably be assumed they won't really need later. Equated times, on half a chessboard, at unambiguous momentum.
@Oblation-Ants
Not all characteristics and not all mutations prove to have survival value. Some have positive survival value, some have negative survival value, some are neutral until the environment changes, and only then become either positive or negative.
In all species, diversity helps to ensure survival. Of course, this applies to a species, not to individuals; individuals do not evolve, only species do.
Okay, I believe ancestral organistic memory which pattern (they had a single body shape) makes them seen as the same. Then I won't get into shared species having claws and evolving a simpler claw or not. An individual entity could care for itself if there was dual purpose to guarding because these species can moderate movement instinctively, conserving energy.