Originally posted by JS357
Gaining a reliable reading of God's Word seems to be a lifelong search, for many. Do you have a favorite, or do you compare and contrast among a few sources?
Thanks for your post here. I contemplated an answer for hours, which is always a pleasure to do. The more complex the issue the better. Manuscript evidence is worth exploring and thinking about.
"Gaining a reliable reading of God's Word seems to be a lifelong search, for many."
There's much to consider. The original autographs are non-existent of course, so how to determine what copies are most reliable takes time and study. I am far from qualified to speak with any authority on the subject of manuscript evidence, but I have read a little by those who I think are.
The particular aspect of this thing concerning the reliability of translations that most interests me is not about
what the evidence is, but
how it came to be. Meaning, how copies were made, and by whom.
I don't have time to get into it here, nor do I want to post 92 paragraphs doing it. Suffice it to say that reliability is best found in the understanding of where and how the generations of copies of copies were transmitted down through the ages with the idea of preservation in mind.
"Do you have a favorite, or do you compare and contrast among a few sources?"
I read and study out of the KJV, but I own a dozen different translations as well as a variety of concordances and other study helps. I've compared hundreds if not thousands of verses and passages between several translations.
Some translations are better than others at conveying the meaning and intent of the text, but after years of bible study I am convinced that there's more to understanding the scriptures than finding the exact word that fits in bringing out the truth of any particular verse or passage.
There's something much greater at stake than a squabble over the translation issue.