Proof God Created The Earth In One Day

Originally posted by RJHinds
Evolutionist claim that for an hypothesis to be accepted, it must be testable. Yet, they accept that granite is caused by cooling of molten material over millions of years. It can't be tested. There seems to be a double standard. Anything creationists say is true, is not accepted. Because they claim it can not be tested; but they readily accept their o ...[text shortened]... act, even though they too are not testable.

P.S. I think Dasa called this cheating science.

they accept that granite is caused by cooling of molten material over millions of years. It can't be tested.

Originally posted by humy

they accept that granite is caused by cooling of molten material over millions of years. It can't be tested.

They CAN test such a hypothesis via indirect observations and logic. What barrier would be stopping them from doing this?
They can, for example, observe micro-crystal growth in samples of collected molten material ( which can be colle ...[text shortened]... like if it cooled over a few million years and then see if that is what is observed in granite.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Evolutionist claim that for an hypothesis to be accepted, it must be testable. Yet, they accept that granite is caused by cooling of molten material over millions of years. It can't be tested. There seems to be a double standard. Anything creationists say is true, is not accepted. Because they claim it can not be tested; but they readily accept their o ...[text shortened]... act, even though they too are not testable.

P.S. I think Dasa called this cheating science.

Originally posted by kaminsky
The fact that the theory of the formation of granite claims that it takes millions of years does not make it untestable . It is a clear and precise claim and can be tested against evidence , advances in physics geology etc may make it possible to make practical tests . It is the point about the clearly precise claim that makes it refutable and therefore di ...[text shortened]... story , as long as science makes precise testable claims and we accept theories fail we move on.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Would of, could of, should of, crapo. Bull, they couldn't do anything but put their heads up their arse.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Thus the heavens and the earth were completed, and all their hosts. By the seventh day God completed His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done.

(Genesis 2:1-2 NASB)

[b]God completed all his work, including the creation of the Earth, in six days and rested on the seventh day.

In the beginnin ...[text shortened]... lled night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.

(Genesis 1:1-5 NASB)[/b]

Originally posted by RJHinds
Thus the heavens and the earth were completed, and all their hosts. By the seventh day God completed His work which He had done, and He rested on the seventh day from all His work which He had done.

(Genesis 2:1-2 NASB)

[b]God completed all his work, including the creation of the Earth, in six days and rested on the seventh day.

In the beginnin ...[text shortened]... lled night. And there was evening and there was morning, one day.

(Genesis 1:1-5 NASB)[/b]

The Holy Bible presents us with a creation week and each day consists of an evening (night time) and a morning (day time).

I believe a week is conveyed. But this week is a week of restoration, recovery, and further creation. This is a week of reconstruction. And we cannot really know too much about what preceeded.

There are other "gaps" in the Scipture. In Hebrews 11, the book of the heros of the faith, there is a gap. The entire 40 years of Israel's wandering in the wilderness is simply NOT accounted for as the writer traverses history of the faithful in the Old Testament.

For his own reasons, the wandering in the wilderness of Sinai for 40 years was simply ignored. It is as if the writer simply does not want to mention anything that happened in that period as being "by faith".

It is left out according to the priorities of the Holy Spirit. The same could be true for time between when God created the heavens and the earth in the beginning and the time the seer sees in his vision the earth in a state of void and emptiness. Like the 40 years of wandering omitted from Hebrews 11, the Holy Spirit could have just left out an interval not of immediate interest to His burden.

1. Genetics has revealed that the human population has never been as low as 8 people, contradicting the story of the flood.

2. There has never been a global flood.

Jawill replied: The phrase "global flood" does not occur in the Bible.

The first point is interesting. However, I doubt that it rises above theory or speculation (albeit well reasoned according to current levels of knowledge) to be a known science FACT.

Originally posted by humy
They CAN AND DO test such a hypotheses via indirect observations, extrapolation and logic.
They act and think vastly more intelligently than you do judging by the nonsenses in your posts.
They also know a lot more than you do.

Originally posted by RJHinds
This so-called nonsense is from people who have more education, experience, and knowledge on these matters than you will ever how. The discovery that granite must have bee created almost instantly is from the work of Robert Gentry, PhD Nuclear Physics.

http://www.equalparenting-bc.ca/funstuff/na_gentry-bob-plutonium-halos.htm

The following people are ...[text shortened]... ert L. Whitelaw M.S. Engineering science

http://creationwiki.org/Template:Creation_scientist

Originally posted by RJHinds
This so-called nonsense is from people who have more education, experience, and knowledge on these matters than you will ever how. The discovery that granite must have bee created almost instantly is from the work of Robert Gentry, PhD Nuclear Physics.

http://www.equalparenting-bc.ca/funstuff/na_gentry-bob-plutonium-halos.htm

The following people are ...[text shortened]... ert L. Whitelaw M.S. Engineering science

http://creationwiki.org/Template:Creation_scientist

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I read it like this:

God creates the heavens and the formless earth covered by water.
God hovers over the waters for an indeterminate time.
God creates light and separates it from darkness. Only now does Day 1 begin.

The 6 days of Gen 2 refer to completion of the work started at the creation of light. They don't specify how long any events before that took.

Originally posted by RJHinds
The following people are modern day advocates of creation science who have one or more graduate degrees in a science discipline.

Originally posted by finnegan
Jaywill does not agree with you. Is he a New Atheist now?

The Holy Bible presents us with a creation week and each day consists of an evening (night time) and a morning (day time).

[b]I believe a week is conveyed. But this week is a week of restoration, recovery, and further creation. This is a week of reconstruction. And we cannot really ll reasoned according to current levels of knowledge) to be a known science FACT.

Originally posted by RJHinds
Yes, it does.

"A true believer must not compromise the clear teachings of the Holy Bible in order to agree with the teachings of sinful man."

Wow! And you still believe in th trinity and have the nerve to say this? Lol