19 Mar 10
2 edits
Premise:
e^(i*pi)=-1
Logic leading to the conclusion:
1.) Assume e^(i*pi)=-1. That -1 looks almost like a -7. Ergo, we can say that e^(i*pi)=-7.
2.) But 7 rhymes with heaven! Therefore heaven must exists!
3.) But heaven is where god exists. If heaven exists, god must exist.
4.) Combing #3 + #4 = god exists!
My logic is infallible.
19 Mar 10
Originally posted by amolv06if i tell you you aren't funny, will you assume that religious folks have no sense of humor and only a superior intellect can grasp your joke?
Premise:
e^(i*pi)=-1
Logic leading to the conclusion:
1.) Assume e^(i*pi)=-1. That -1 looks almost like a -7. Ergo, we can say that e^(i*pi)=-7.
2.) But 7 rhymes with heaven! Therefore heaven must exists!
3.) But heaven is where god exists. If heaven exists, god must exist.
4.) Combing #3 + #4 = god exists!
My logic is infallible.
20 Mar 10
Originally posted by ZahlanziNo, I'll simply cover my ears, scream lalala, and continue operating under the assumption that I am hilarious. And brilliantly correct.
if i tell you you aren't funny, will you assume that religious folks have no sense of humor and only a superior intellect can grasp your joke?
20 Mar 10
1 edit
Originally posted by amolv06But if you take the cotangent of your logic and multiply it by the square root of your premise, they cancel each other out.
Premise:
e^(i*pi)=-1
Logic leading to the conclusion:
1.) Assume e^(i*pi)=-1. That -1 looks almost like a -7. Ergo, we can say that e^(i*pi)=-7.
2.) But 7 rhymes with heaven! Therefore heaven must exists!
3.) But heaven is where god exists. If heaven exists, god must exist.
4.) Combing #3 + #4 = god exists!
My logic is infallible.
Wait a second, I am a theist, I should be trying to help you. Curses, foiled again!! ðŸ˜
20 Mar 10
3 edits
Originally posted by amolv061.) Assume e^(i*pi)=-1...
Premise:
e^(i*pi)=-1
Logic leading to the conclusion:
1.) Assume e^(i*pi)=-1. That -1 looks almost like a -7. Ergo, we can say that e^(i*pi)=-7.
2.) But 7 rhymes with heaven! Therefore heaven must exists!
3.) But heaven is where god exists. If heaven exists, god must exist.
4.) Combing #3 + #4 = god exists!
My logic is infallible.
Assuming a fact...ok...
1)...That -1 looks almost like a -7
Does it bollox!!! -1 looks like a tap. Ergo e^(i*pi) =-1 looks like a tap
2.) But 7 rhymes with heaven! Therefore heaven must exists!
correcting your mistake above, "tap" rhymes with "cr*p" Therefore cr*p exists in your whole post
3.) But heaven is where god exists. If heaven exists, god must exist.
We have shown thus far your argument (particularly at #2) contains cr*p,; hence you cannot deduce #3 from #2
4.) Combing #3 + #4 = god exists!
self referencing statement.
Your logic 0 - utter nonsense 1
🙂
20 Mar 10
Originally posted by amolv06So you have deduced that such arguments are utter nonsense
So you have deduced that such arguments are utter nonsense. Interesting.
/sigh. I have given you the proof. It's sad when you shine the light right into people's eyes, yet they refuse to see it.
I wouldn't go that far... replace "such" with "my"
🙂
21 Mar 10
2 edits
Originally posted by amolv06So then if your formula actually did prove the existence of God we would have to base that belief on a kind of faith that reasoning can lead to truth.
I never made this claim, nor do I think it invariably does.
Undergirding your formula is an underlying "faith" that mathematical reasoning can lead to truth.
But we cannot prove that it does.
Of course the Bible doesn't wait for you to have to realize that. It tells you right up front that this truth about God's existence is known by faith.
Or faith PLUS God's faithfulNESS.
21 Mar 10
Originally posted by jaywill"It tells you right up front that this truth about God's existence is known by faith."
So then if your formula actually did prove the existence of God we would have to base that belief on a kind of faith that reasoning can lead to truth.
Undergirding your formula is an underlying "faith" that mathematical reasoning can lead to truth.
But we cannot prove that it does.
Of course the Bible doesn't wait for you to have to realize t ...[text shortened]... ruth about God's existence is known by faith.
Or faith PLUS God's [b]faithfulNESS. [/b]
Now hold on there brother. It seems to me that Romans 1 makes it clear that creation is proof of God's existence.
At least that's the way I see it, but I would like to hear your reply.
21 Mar 10
Originally posted by josephwI might be wrong.
[b]"It tells you right up front that this truth about God's existence is known by faith."
Now hold on there brother. It seems to me that Romans 1 makes it clear that creation is proof of God's existence.
At least that's the way I see it, but I would like to hear your reply.[/b]