Originally posted by RJHinds Notice that when Jesus said, "It has been said to them of old.......but I say unto you..." that He made the law more strict concerning the heart of the matter. For example, to lust after another women other than your wife is committing adultry in your heart.
One of the rare occasions that I agree with you, in this specific part of your post anyway. Jesus did indeed raise the bar; he did so because he paid the price irrespective of where the bar is. In the OT the sacrifices even in their harshness were still a compromise by God in terms of righteousness. There is actually no need for hell after the atonement. This is the whole point of the gospel.
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
15 Sep '14 15:59>3 edits
Originally posted by divegeester "I would not be surprised"...and "perhaps" Aslan will return before Jesus...
It seems by saying this you unfurl your true flag as an unbeliever in the Son of God.
I took you for granted as perhaps a evangelical who does not believe in eternal suffering punishment. Such do exist.
But by this last crack it seems perhaps your true colors are showing. The whole Gospel you consider poppycock? Am I wrong about you ?
Originally posted by sonship It seems by saying this you unfurl your true flag as an unbeliever in the Son of God.
I took you for granted as perhaps a evangelical who does not believe in eternal suffering punishment. Such do exist.
But by this last crack it seems perhaps your true colors are showing. The whole Gospel you consider poppycock? Am I wrong about you ?
Are you wrong about anything?
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
15 Sep '14 16:06>
Originally posted by divegeester I think you'll find sonship doesn't make "mistakes".
Good post by the way.
I think you'll find sonship doesn't make "mistakes".
I am human and I make mistakes.
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
15 Sep '14 16:08>2 edits
Originally posted by divegeester Are you wrong about anything?
Are you wrong about anything?
In life I have of course discovered that I was wrong about many things.
Let's not chit chat one liners. Give me your substantive comment.
Right now I am interested if you really think the second coming of Christ is as comparableto Aslan the Lion entertainment.
Were you serious ?
If you were it might explain something I have been wondering about.
In life I have of course discovered that I was wrong about many things.
Let's not chit chat one liners. Give me your substantive comment.
Right now I am interested if you really think the second coming of Christ is as comparableto Aslan the Lion entertainment.
Were you serious ?
If you were it might explain something I have been wondering about.
Then admit you are wrong about the rapture before the tribulation. 😏
In life I have of course discovered that I was wrong about many things.
Let's not chit chat one liners. Give me your substantive comment.
Right now I am interested if you really think the second coming of Christ is as comparableto Aslan the Lion entertainment.
Were you serious ?
If you were it might explain something I have been wondering about.
If you read my post you'll see I'm poking at your use of certain qualifiers which could mean anything..."possibly".
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
15 Sep '14 16:17>1 edit
Originally posted by CalJust
Finally, Jesus throughout his ministry fought against a literal interpretation of Scripture. (It has been said to them of old.......but I say unto you...)
His worst antagonists where always the literalists!
Why did Jesus say of the Old Testament "And Scripture cannot be broken." ? See John 10:35 .
If He downplayed literal interpretation why He say that?
English Standard Version If he called them gods to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be broken—
New American Standard Bible "If he called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken),
King James Bible If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;
This better be good.
Removed
Joined
03 Jan '13
Moves
13080
15 Sep '14 16:20>
Originally posted by divegeester If you read my post you'll see I'm poking at your use of certain qualifiers which could mean anything..."possibly".
Huh?
Listen, if you are going to debunk me just give me a straight forward debunking. That will help me.
I guess it takes all kinds to make a world. Do you have any other verses in scripture that you believe supports your idea that the Second Death in the Lake of Fire and Brimstone has already occurred?
Originally posted by RJHinds I guess it takes all kinds to make a world. Do you have any other verses in scripture that you believe supports your idea that the Second Death in the Lake of Fire and Brimstone has already occurred?