Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeI’m going by what Miss Alawat says. She is tiger’s teacher.
Incorrect. A question mark would only go inside quotation marks if it were part of the quoted material. (Which it wasn't).
A question mark, not part of the quoted material, as in Dive's case, would go on the outside. (Where Dive placed it).
Bearing in mind Becker has stated in another thread that errors are actually forms of lying, are you h ...[text shortened]... , or just someone who has embarrassed himself by incorrectly challenging someone else's grammar?
Originally posted by @romans1009You really are a weak human being.
I’m going by what Miss Alawat says. She is tiger’s teacher.
When it was pointed out to me that I had made an error I immediately acknowledged I was mistaken. However, when you make an error (I'm ignoring the tedious Miss Alawat nonsense) you can't bring yourself to acknowledge it. Why is that? You and only you arrogantly corrected another poster's grammar and did so erroneously.
Is it a pride thing?
'The Lord detests all the proud of heart. Be sure of this: They will not go unpunished.' (Proverbs 16:5).
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYou and FMF have been claiming you expressed yourself perfectly clearly and perfectly fine when you said you had no notion of divine law.
You really are a weak human being.
When it was pointed out to me that I had made an error I immediately acknowledged I was mistaken. However, when you make an error (I'm ignoring the tedious Miss Alawat nonsense) you can't bring yourself to acknowledge it. Why is that? You and only you arrogantly corrected another poster's grammar and did so erro ...[text shortened]... detests all the proud of heart. Be sure of this: They will not go unpunished.' (Proverbs 16:5).
Everyone knows you expressed yourself very poorly and that you should have said you didn’t recognize divine law as legitimate or put no credence in it. Saying you have no notion of it is obviously expressing a different thought, but you refuse to admit it and instead attack me for pointing it out. You’re now engaging in psychological projection by claiming that I refuse to acknowledge when I’m wrong.
Sick!
Originally posted by @romans1009So, it is a pride thing?
You and FMF have been claiming you expressed yourself perfectly clearly and perfectly fine when you said you had no notion of divine law.
Everyone knows you expressed yourself very poorly and that you should have said you didn’t recognize divine law as legitimate or put no credence in it. Saying you have no notion of it is obviously expressing a diffe ...[text shortened]... ng in psychological projection by claiming that I refuse to acknowledge when I’m wrong.
Sick!
Golden rule. if you're going to arrogantly correct someone's grammar you better make damn sure you know what you're talking about.
Unfortunately, you didn't.
Originally posted by @apathistWhere did I mention heaven?
Blinded by the light. earth band
Do not go into the light! poltergeist
I'm saying it's a trap. What is so wonderful about heaven anyway. Really!
-Removed-Yes. Why so argumentative, tiger? Are you still hung over from last night? You didn’t come home until after 3 and almost missed the school bus!
No more drinking like that on a school night; I don’t care what Kiddo says. He’s not the one who makes you PB&J sandwiches with the crusts cut off.
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYour fixation and obsession with things is not indicative of a psychologically healthy person.
Romans will never admit he erroneously corrected your grammar and publicly embarrassed himself.
It's a pride thing.