It's becoming apparent to me that voluminous posts in this forum militate against clarity. Ineffective communication and needless frictions result. Let's give a single sentence reply experiment a shot. Compound sentences are frowned upon but permitted. All topics should be introduced in an orderly manner. Too many conversations in progress will discourage participation. Topics should also respect this forum's charter: "Debate and general discussion of the supernatural, religion, and the life after." (Russ & Chris) I owe Paul Dirac II conversation on the topic of "Tithing". And have enjoyed swapping thoughts with JS357 and googlefudge on the topic of Rene Descartes' intricate speculations. Thank you. -Bob
Note: Penguin, how could I forget mentioning you with reference to Descartes. Please accept my apology.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby [b]"RHP Spirituality Forum Experiment"
It's becoming apparent to me that voluminous posts in this forum militate against clarity. Ineffective communication and needless frictions result. Let's give a single sentence reply experiment a shot. Compound sentences are frowned upon but permitted. All topics should be introduced in an orderly man ...[text shortened]... nd googlefudge on the topic of Rene Descartes' intricate speculations. Thank you. -Bob[/b]
"Compound sentences are frowned upon but permitted."
I think you need to have a RHP club of your own, GB.
Thanks and I would love to have that actually happen and I hope it does. As long as terms such as dense, idiot, amnesia, fool..well you get the picture, are not used or even implyed, I'm in.
Nothing will ever be learned or taught or even just shared as long as those terms are used.
I say if one cannot communicate without those terms in their comments, or dislike the subject, they need to refrain from commenting.
Let ones who desire to have a cilvil discussion, have it. Too much highjacking with negative intensions.
Originally posted by galveston75 Thanks and I would love to have that actually happen and I hope it does. As long as terms such as dense, idiot, amnesia, fool..well you get the picture, are not used or even implyed, I'm in.
Nothing will ever be learned or taught or even just shared as long as those terms are used.
I say if one cannot communicate without those terms in their comments ...[text shortened]... who desire to have a cilvil discussion, have it. Too much highjacking with negative intensions.
Would civil single sentence replies help diffuse animosities and minimize some of the friction and heat?
Originally posted by galveston75 It might, I hope.
So what do we talk about?
"Topics should also respect this forum's charter: "Debate and general discussion of the supernatural, religion, and the life after." (Russ & Chris) [OP]
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby "Topics should also respect this forum's charter: "Debate and general discussion of the supernatural, religion, and the life after." (Russ & Chris) [OP]
"RHP Spirituality Forum Experiment"
30 Jun '13 00:013 edits
Back to Top