04 Apr '13 15:03>
Rules Governing Human Conduct
Life on earth can be lived and enjoyed or endured and despised. Many rules, principles and laws have been in play since the first footprints within the boundaries of an early garden. The imbedded restraints range from mild reminders to stern rebukes to outright loss of privileges and rights of participation. At its simplest, the behavioral span's inclusive of Obedience to The Law of Gravity; Respect for Fire; Avoidance of Various Consumable Properties [which may become harmful, if and when ingested]; Responsible Operation of Boats, Motorcycles, Automobiles and Aircraft; Violation of Statutes and Laws [encoded to protect and preserve the property and life itself of all citizens within any civilized society].
The above horizontal examples are neither exhaustive nor definitive; sole purpose is to establish frame of reference for segue to vertical application. Does it not seem reasonable to consider the notion that an unmoved mover or supreme being may, also, think in terms of clarity of purpose and orderliness? That, if so, institutions such as self determination [volition]; marriage; family [as the fundamental unit of commuity structure]; freedom through military victory; and nationalism are much more to be reckoned with than ignored or scorned? Further to the crux of resident authority and its expectations, wouldn't some higher order of being or creator desire contact and even relationship with the product of its own creative expression? My purpose here isnt to promote rancorous argumentation but, rather, to invite pro/con positions with point of view rationales.
.
Life on earth can be lived and enjoyed or endured and despised. Many rules, principles and laws have been in play since the first footprints within the boundaries of an early garden. The imbedded restraints range from mild reminders to stern rebukes to outright loss of privileges and rights of participation. At its simplest, the behavioral span's inclusive of Obedience to The Law of Gravity; Respect for Fire; Avoidance of Various Consumable Properties [which may become harmful, if and when ingested]; Responsible Operation of Boats, Motorcycles, Automobiles and Aircraft; Violation of Statutes and Laws [encoded to protect and preserve the property and life itself of all citizens within any civilized society].
The above horizontal examples are neither exhaustive nor definitive; sole purpose is to establish frame of reference for segue to vertical application. Does it not seem reasonable to consider the notion that an unmoved mover or supreme being may, also, think in terms of clarity of purpose and orderliness? That, if so, institutions such as self determination [volition]; marriage; family [as the fundamental unit of commuity structure]; freedom through military victory; and nationalism are much more to be reckoned with than ignored or scorned? Further to the crux of resident authority and its expectations, wouldn't some higher order of being or creator desire contact and even relationship with the product of its own creative expression? My purpose here isnt to promote rancorous argumentation but, rather, to invite pro/con positions with point of view rationales.
.