1. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    06 Jan '13 18:47
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    Your friend has a really loose definition of proof.
    You've seen his proof then?
  2. Standard memberGrampy Bobby
    Boston Lad
    USA
    Joined
    14 Jul '07
    Moves
    43012
    06 Jan '13 21:53
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    I have a friend too.
    He sent me this;
    Theologians have discovered indisputable proof that no deity
    exists. Previously the knowledge was held only by the Vatican
    but it has been leaked to the JWs and Mormons who are now
    arguing over who found out first.


    [b]indisputable proof
    that means you cannot dispute it because its indisputable[/b]
    Isn't it certain that every material or immaterial effect must have a certain cause?
  3. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    06 Jan '13 22:06
    Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
    Isn't it certain that every material or immaterial effect must have a certain cause?
    No.
    Modern quantum theory suggests that sub-atomic particles
    can spontaneously appear and disappear.
    Without any cause.
  4. Standard memberGrampy Bobby
    Boston Lad
    USA
    Joined
    14 Jul '07
    Moves
    43012
    06 Jan '13 22:111 edit
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    No.
    Modern quantum theory suggests that sub-atomic particles
    can spontaneously appear and disappear.
    Without any cause.
    ... for short spurts of time in vacuums without any apparent or visible cause?
  5. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    06 Jan '13 22:17
    Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
    ... for short spurts of time in vacuums without any apparent or visible cause?
    I'm not going to pretend I understand it but I'm
    smart enough to know that there are others
    smart enough who do!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation
  6. SubscriberSuzianne
    Misfit Queen
    Isle of Misfit Toys
    Joined
    08 Aug '03
    Moves
    36669
    07 Jan '13 00:01
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    You've seen his proof then?
    No.

    It's just that no one can prove that:

    a)any deity exists.

    or that:

    b)no deity exists.
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Jan '13 05:48
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    I'm quite happy with your argument that God has no creator because he has always been. (Its the same argument that atheists use for the Universe not requiring a creator)
    [b]BUT

    You cannot use logic and science in an argument and then use the phrase
    "before time began"
    its self-contradictory [/b]
    You say:
    You cannot use logic and science in an argument and then use the phrase
    "before time began"
    its self-contradictory

    I say that depends on your definition and view of time.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
  8. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Jan '13 06:23
    Originally posted by avalanchethecat
    I did glance briefly at the creationist site you referenced, but finding that the article in question is a chapter from a book published in 1963 overly taxed my ability to consider the potential pertinence of any information contained therein.

    Here's a link for you:

    http://tinyurl.com/aheonz9

    It's a google search listing over 2 million resu ...[text shortened]... truly amazing advances in genetic science not available to Morris prior to his publication.
    If they think genetics is based on evolution, then they are wrong and stupid too. There is genetic adaptation but no genetic evolution. 😏
  9. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Jan '13 06:48
    Originally posted by Suzianne
    No.

    It's just that no one can prove that:

    a)any deity exists.

    or that:

    b)no deity exists.
    Suzianne, I am surprised that you claim there is no proof a deity exists. What about God, the creator of the universe? Don't you consider God a deity? Don't you believe he created the heavens and the earth? Is that not proof that a deity exists. Don't you believe the Lord Jesus the Christ, the eternal Son of God, became a man? Don't you believe God raised Jesus from the dead after three days and nights like was predicted? Why is that not proof that a deity exists?

    I suppose you must also believe the Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo are fakes and not the actual burial clothes of Christ or perhaps there is no proof Jesus the Christ even exited. That does not sound like a Christian to me. Perhaps you have a different definition of a Christian. I hope not. I hope you were just not thinking this through.
  10. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    07 Jan '13 06:56
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Suzianne, I am surprised that you claim there is no proof a deity exists. What about God, the creator of the universe? Don't you consider God a deity? Don't you believe he created the heavens and the earth? Is that not proof that a deity exists. Don't you believe the Lord Jesus the Christ, the eternal Son of God, became a man? Don't you believe God raise ...[text shortened]... ent definition of a Christian. I hope not. I hope you were just not thinking this through.
    She realistic on the scientific front - and that does not have to be represented from the internal front, which is her right, and correctly so in presenting!

    You know there is no realistic proof of any God!

    There is also no proof of any God not existing.

    Get real with the facts, and stop dreaming man.

    -m.
  11. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    07 Jan '13 07:49
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    You say:
    You cannot use logic and science in an argument and then use the phrase
    "before time began"
    its self-contradictory

    I say that depends on your definition and view of time.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
    ?
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Jan '13 19:11
    Originally posted by wolfgang59
    ?
    Clear as mud to you, huh? 😏
  13. Standard memberavalanchethecat
    Not actually a cat
    The Flat Earth
    Joined
    09 Apr '10
    Moves
    14988
    07 Jan '13 19:25
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    If they think genetics is based on evolution, then they are wrong and stupid too. There is genetic adaptation but no genetic evolution. 🙄
    You ain't gettin' any smarter, are you? Perhaps you have a brain parasite or something.
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    07 Jan '13 21:37
    Originally posted by avalanchethecat
    You ain't gettin' any smarter, are you? Perhaps you have a brain parasite or something.
    There is nothing the evolution fairy tale can teach me anyway. 😏
  15. Standard memberwolfgang59
    Quiz Master
    RHP Arms
    Joined
    09 Jun '07
    Moves
    48793
    08 Jan '13 02:25
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    huh? 😏
    YouTube
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree