13 Apr '14 13:30>
Originally posted by RJHindsSo now I have been elevated to the status of God. Wow.
You already did that. It didn't phase me in the least.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat you think of as design that requires a designer is better explained as adaptation
There is no natural evolution for the better, only adaptation to a point, at best. Evolution requires design change, which always requires the input of new information from a Designer.
Originally posted by C HessI probably understand DNA better than most people on RHP. I know that the DNA molecule of a cell is something like a hard drive storage media in computers. It stores the information programming for the construction of parts in the cell and the total reproduction of cells.
What you think of as design that requires a designer is better explained as adaptation
through selective natural pressure. It's the better explanation, because it is the simpler one,
and it fits the evidence.
How well do you understand DNA? What it's made of, how it's replicated and the various
ways in which it can mutate during replication?
Originally posted by RJHindsYou shouldn't really believe in Youtube, you know.
DNA Refutes Evolution
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rCkFLq3uts
Originally posted by FabianFnasYes, but YouTube takes me away to a world in which I'm a great presenter, like the guy I'm watching, and the opposition doesn't get to respond, because this is my YouTube channel.
You shouldn't really believe in Youtube, you know.
Every opinion has its counterpart and you can find them both in Youtube.
Whatever opinion there is in the world, there is a corresponding Youtube clip.
Because you don't take the evolution clips for the truth, do you? Then why should the evilution clips be more truth?
If you use Youtube as your bible, then you have big problems.
Originally posted by RJHindsI will respond to the first two videos later (when I'm seated by my desktop and can type on
I probably understand DNA better than most people on RHP. I know that the DNA molecule of a cell is something like a hard drive storage media in computers. It stores the information programming for the construction of parts in the cell and the total reproduction of cells.
Here is a quick video introduction to what I mean.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...[text shortened]... w.youtube.com/watch?v=_O-kLA3uEyA
What is DNA?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwibgNGe4aY
Originally posted by C HessThe laws the governs chemistry were made by God.
I will respond to the first two videos later (when I'm seated by my desktop and can type on
a keyboard because this smartphone typing is annoying to the point of insanity), the last
video is an excellent introduction to DNA that I have no objection to (in fact, ironically
enough it ends by pointing out that as complicated as it seems, it's all chemistry ...[text shortened]... t a designer input, which is a patently false statement, as I will
demonstrate in my response.
Originally posted by RJHindsThe problem with the first video is that he's using a metaphor to describe
I probably understand DNA better than most people on RHP. I know that the DNA molecule of a cell is something like a hard drive storage media in computers. It stores the information programming for the construction of parts in the cell and the total reproduction of cells.
Here is a quick video introduction to what I mean.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...[text shortened]... w.youtube.com/watch?v=_O-kLA3uEyA
What is DNA?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwibgNGe4aY
Originally posted by C HessWe expect the universe to be organized in a logical, orderly fashion and to obey uniform laws because the universe was created by the power of God.
Prove it.
Originally posted by C HessThe DNA molecule is not the actual code, but it stores coded information as the second video proves. The replication process is not random, but pre-programmed by the coded information that must be read and interpreted to produce the correct proteins in a specific order. You need to review these videos again so you can correct your errors in thinking about DNA.
The problem with the first video is that he's using a metaphor to describe
what the DNA is about, but the metaphor is poorly chosen. DNA is "code" for
life, in the same way that black powder is "code" for thermal energy.
The process by which DNA is used to produce proteins is under ideal
circumstances as portrayed in the last video, but often (like r ...[text shortened]... , it appears as
though someone designed only the forms to fill their specific niche in nature.