25 Mar '15 04:24>
Originally posted by FMFI didn't realize you were only looking for a simple "yes" or "no" answer.
So that's a "no" then?
Originally posted by lemon limeIf you were sincere in your efforts to oppose "hate speech" and thought you had a good handle on what it actually is, you would surely be able to give a straight forward answer to my straight forward yes or no question.
I didn't realize you were only looking for a simple "yes" or "no" answer.
Originally posted by FMFMost people think it's a good idea to have reasons for what they say... and if you sincerely wanted to know what I was saying then perhaps you should have taken the time to read what I said.
If you were sincere in your efforts to oppose "hate speech" and thought you had a good handle on what it actually is, you would surely be able to give a straight forward answer to my straight forward yes or no question.
Originally posted by lemon limeI did. That's why I called you on it. In my experience here at RHP, posters brandishing the notion of "hate speech" more often than not do so in an attempt to poison the discourse ~ land a punch, so to speak, even in weaselly or waffly ways, as in your case ~ and they do not intend their reference to "hate speech" to be an attempt at genuine analysis. I suppose, in a way, your reaction to me calling you on it two or three posts ago is a sign that you are perhaps engaged in the 'more often than not' thing.
Most people think it's a good idea to have reasons for what they say... and if you sincerely wanted to know what I was saying then perhaps you should have taken the time to read what I said.
Originally posted by sonhouseVery broad brush you are painting everyone with, care to be a little bit more
But theists have no such ability. They can NEVER be wrong (in their own minds) They are filled to the brim with absolute certainty.
Even if that certainty is opposite other theist's certainty.
Wars start over such certainty.
Originally posted by FMFIt's been nice chatting with you... we should it again sometime. 😵
I did. That's why I called you on it. In my experience here at RHP, posters brandishing the notion of "hate speech" more often than not do so in an attempt to poison the discourse ~ land a punch, so to speak, even in weaselly or waffly ways, as in your case ~ and they do not intend their reference to "hate speech" to be an attempt at genuine analysis. I suppose, ...[text shortened]... wo or three posts ago is a sign that you are perhaps engaged in the 'more often than not' thing.
Originally posted by KellyJay...I do however believe more than one Atheist here believes what they believe about the universe is true and those that don't see the universe the way they do are all wrong, because they are just certain they view things as they are, in other words they can never be wrong (in their own minds).
I responded to you about this once already, I don't know a single Theist
that believes they cannot be wrong...
Originally posted by Great King RatI could be wrong about many things, but I do not count those among them.
So you could be wrong about the existence of god? It could be that, despite what you believe, there is no god and this life is all there is?
Yes? No? Maybe?
Originally posted by RJHindsIt is the difference between someone's facts and another's faith. I say faith
I could be wrong about many things, but I do not count those among them.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the LORD! Holy! Holy! Holy!
The post that was quoted here has been removedThat is very true, it is not the dog soldiers I am talking about, not infantry or the flyboys, I am talking about the politicians who make the decisions to go to war.
Originally posted by KellyJayI don't know a single Theist
Very broad brush you are painting everyone with, care to be a little bit more
specific? Scientist can be wrong about what? Theist can never be wrong
about what?
I responded to you about this once already, I don't know a single Theist
that believes they cannot be wrong, I do however believe more than one
Atheist here believes what they believe about ...[text shortened]... make
you someone of importance, I would guess in your mind, well I think you
get the picture.
Originally posted by SuzianneThere you go. Sonhouse was right.
No.
Originally posted by Great King RatThere you go. Sonhouse was right.
There you go. Sonhouse was right.
How about your brand of religion? Do you think there is a chance Muslims have it right when it comes to their beliefs, and not you? Could RJHinds' ideas about how god operates be correct and not yours?
Do you think your beliefs about god being good, might be wrong?