1. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    26 Oct '12 19:48
    Originally posted by tomtom232
    I thought things like the shroud of turin were supposed to transfer the original image onto anything the image was touched to... so we can have evidence either way. If it does do this then that is pretty convinincing. However, it probably doesn't or else it would be the biggest story in the world.
    No. You have a wrong understanding. The Shroud of Turin represents the image of Christ that was supernaturally transferred to His burial linen at the ressurection. It is not an image made by hands. The Scientific team investigating the Shroud have determined that there is no known way for man to reproduce all the characteristics of the image as shown on the Shroud of Turin.
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    28 Oct '12 15:17
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    No. You have a wrong understanding. The Shroud of Turin represents the image of Christ that was supernaturally transferred to His burial linen at the ressurection. It is not an image made by hands. The Scientific team investigating the Shroud have determined that there is no known way for man to reproduce all the characteristics of the image as shown on the Shroud of Turin.
    You are hallucinating as usual.
  3. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    28 Oct '12 15:24
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    No. You have a wrong understanding. The Shroud of Turin represents the image of Christ that was supernaturally transferred to His burial linen at the ressurection. It is not an image made by hands. The Scientific team investigating the Shroud have determined that there is no known way for man to reproduce all the characteristics of the image as shown on the Shroud of Turin.
    It therefore cannot be used as scientific evidence.
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    28 Oct '12 16:12
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    It therefore cannot be used as scientific evidence.
    Why? Is it because it defies complete scientific explanation from the scientist?
    Why not use that part that can be explained by the scientist as scientific evidence and the part that can not be explained by the scientist as supernatural evidence?
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    28 Oct '12 17:36
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Why? Is it because it defies complete scientific explanation from the scientist?
    Why not use that part that can be explained by the scientist as scientific evidence and the part that can not be explained by the scientist as supernatural evidence?
    Because you are full of shyte, it is not supernatural for one thing. And for another you are as usual, full of shyte.
  6. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    28 Oct '12 21:41
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Because you are full of shyte, it is not supernatural for one thing. And for another you are as usual, full of shyte.
    That is not true. I take regular dumps and don't allow myself to get full of shyte. 😏
  7. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102622
    29 Oct '12 01:52
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    That is not true. I take regular dumps and don't allow myself to get full of shyte. 😏
    I think he means your head is full of crap. Dont worry, you're not alone.
  8. Standard memberSoothfast
    0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,
    Planet Rain
    Joined
    04 Mar '04
    Moves
    2700
    29 Oct '12 04:46
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    Ah so you keep harping on about the shroud like a broken record for our benefit.

    Well let me clear something up.

    As you rightly say, those that don't need evidence to believe don't and wont care about the shroud being the right age either way.

    Those that do care about evidence [b]will also not care about how old the shroud is either way


    ...[text shortened]... is going to care either.




    So why do you keep posting about it?

    Whats the point?[/b]
    Honestly, even if someone came down from the sky today and parted the Red Sea and turned water into wine before my very eyes, I would conclude that he was an extraterrestrial being possessing extremely advanced technology. As an explanation it would still be immeasurably simpler than resorting to the supernatural.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree