Originally posted by vishvahetu Still fault finding i see........I have only had a computer for less than 18 months, and I used the spell checker all the time in micro-soft word, but my browser for RHP didn't have a spell check facility.
I only just up-dated to Google chrome a few weeks ago, and now I have a spell check facility.
Why am I explaining this to you ...I dont know!
Your mind requires external technical support to put letters in the right order.
But to apprehend the fundamental nature of reality, it requires no assistance.
Originally posted by divegeester What you call fault finding I call discernment; if you had any, you would have seen the humour/irony in my post.
You are clearly fault finding, because you have nothing to offer.
You have no such thing as discernment, because you have the madness disease called atheism, and this disqualifies you from being able to discern anything.
Originally posted by vishvahetu You are clearly fault finding, because you have nothing to offer.
You have no such thing as discernment, because you have the madness disease called atheism, and this disqualifies you from being able to discern anything.
Vishy,
this is very fishy
for divegeester says he's a missy
and is very dishy
i think hes a dude
and not a little crude
but an atheist he is not
and should therefore kick your bot!
Originally posted by vishvahetu You are clearly fault finding, because you have nothing to offer.
You have no such thing as discernment, because you have the madness disease called atheism, and this disqualifies you from being able to discern anything.
So I'm a 'disqualified, fault-finding, mad atheist with no discernment and nothing to offer'...?
I'm so pleased your wonderful philosophy prevents you from giving insults...
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Vishy,
this is very fishy
for divegeester says he's a missy
and is very dishy
i think hes a dude
and not a little crude
but an atheist he is not
and should therefore kick your bot!
Originally posted by vishvahetu So your saying, to prove a person knows right from wrong.....they must be good at spelling.
And if they arent good at spelling then they dont know right from wrong.
This is the type of thing, only a person with the madness disease would say.
I am saying that, given your elementary intellectual deficiencies, your lecturing others about moral and metaphysical truth comes across as pitifully egotistical.
I am not saying you must be wrong about moral and metaphysical truth because you can't spell unaided.
I am saying that, given that you can't spell unaided, you have no business asserting your own infallibility about moral and metaphysical truth, at the top of your hysterical little voice.
Originally posted by vishvahetu You are clearly fault finding, because you have nothing to offer.
You have no such thing as discernment, because you have the madness disease called atheism, and this disqualifies you from being able to discern anything.
the best sort of christians are the ones that seem like athiests
Simple truths. But we hide it, we disguise essence through superficial means. Easy to see amongst our materialist expressions- how things get buried amongst consumerism, social trends irrelevant with our actual necessities. Or how formalities can be a hindrance, where language is supposed to be about communicating a message and grammar establishes a track- as if all these rearranged and recycled letters are supposed to mean anything either way. Or how we encapsulate something in a misrepresentative, dogmatic fashion of ambiguous, contextual, guidelines. Sometimes this works, sometimes I start with my right foot. Sometimes that works. While the sun shines for me, the moon glows for you, and this too will phase. Simple truth. Or how everything already is.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie Vishy,
this is very fishy
for divegeester says he's a missy
and is very dishy
i think hes a dude
and not a little crude
but an atheist he is not
and should therefore kick your bot!
Robbie Carrobie
whos arguments are ropey
now siding with vishy
whos logic is squishy
The former's ok
but his views are astray
the latter is dafter
his views deserve laughter.
I have mentioned before, that false religion is on par with atheism, because false religion doesn't raise the consciousness of the person to the transcendental platform, and it misdirects people away from the real truth of God and life.
For goodness sake, Christians are the biggest animal killers in the world, with all their automatically controlled slaughter houses to make killing very efficient.
Animal killing alone will ensure that you take re-birth in this material world, to answer to your karma.
This conduct is on the level of atheism, and thinking you are on the spiritual path is an illusion.
Its because of false religion, that people take to atheism in the first place, because their teachings cannot elevate them to the transcendental platform.
I know Divegeester is a neo Christian, which means he thinks Jesus has taken away all his Karma and he is going back to the spiritual world at the end of his life....but this is false, because he has false knowledge of God and has yet to apply the purification process to his life, and must come to the proper understanding of the spiritual requirements of the religious life, before going back home to Godhead is possible.
Originally posted by IshDaGegg I am saying that, given your elementary intellectual deficiencies, your lecturing others about moral and metaphysical truth comes across as pitifully egotistical.
I am not saying you must be wrong about moral and metaphysical truth because you can't spell unaided.
I am saying that, given that you can't spell unaided, you have no business asserting yo ...[text shortened]... infallibility about moral and metaphysical truth, at the top of your hysterical little voice.
Your saying the exact same thing.... that if someone is not a terrific speller, they dont know right from wrong.
Is that all you have,..... is your digging around to find fault hit the bottom of the barrel.
Originally posted by vishvahetu Its because of false religion, that people take to atheism in the first place, because their teachings cannot elevate them to the transcendental platform.
Your teachings - very apparently - cannot elevate anyone here, either - certainly not to any "transcendental platform". Have you ever considered the possibility that your style of teaching is counterproductive and alienating? Or does ego rule out such self-evaluation?
Simple truth.
11 Dec '10 07:32
Back to Top