So god is in charge of life forms, right?

Originally posted by Penguin
I was going to pipe in here and mention Francis Collins, head of the Human Genome Project, Christian, and author of The Language of God, a book that explains Evolution and why he believes it is the mechanism used by God.

However, the link does not actually state that "evolution is only believed by unbelievers". It says that all unbelievers support ...[text shortened]... cies. What's one more contradiction between friends to also accept Evolution?

--- Penguin.

True believers can not support evolution, because it is in direct contradiction to the Word of God. God created the physical heavens and earth and all biological creatures within six days by speaking the Word. There was no evolution involved or any hint of evolution. These biological creatures, including man, were created to reproduce after their own kind, not to evolve into a different kind. What some claim is proof of evolution is no more than proof that God provided for a manner of adaption through His designed reproductive systems for the creatures. The discovery of the information code of the DNA molecules is further proof of His design and purpose in the Creators' biological creatures.

HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Originally posted by RJHinds
Old man, you didn't refute anything. You were only talking out your arse. 😀

And you didn't look at the link did you?

Originally posted by RJHinds
True believers can not support evolution, because it is in direct contradiction to the Word of God. God created the physical heavens and earth and all biological creatures within six days by speaking the Word. There was no evolution involved or any hint of evolution. These biological creatures, including man, were created to reproduce after their own kind ...[text shortened]... ose in the Creators' biological creatures.

HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Do you think the structure of DNA can change Mr RJHinds?

Originally posted by sonhouse
So answer me this: Take a look at this article and then comment:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-immune-foiled-hairpin.html

So your god created all of us in a wave of its metaphorical hand. How do you explain these organisms that attack gods creation? Why would a god invent humans and animals and such but then create life forms that attacks the very life your god supposedly created?

You do not listen.

Karma is responsible for the affect.

Your deeds and thoughts and words are responsible for the cause.

You create the circumstances of your life for the present life and for the next life.

Say for instance you work in a slaughter house killing cows for money.

The cows are suffering in cruel conditions.

You are the cause.

When you become an animal in your next life .......you shall experienece what you caused to animals when your were responsible for them.

If you caused pain and suffering towards the animals at your own hands.......then when you take birth as an animal - you shall experience the same - even if it is at the hands of another animal.

In Vedic times millions of years ago the animals did not kill each other as they do to day.

All the animals who you see killing each other - were humans in their past life and they were cruel and violent towards other humans and towards animals as well.

Therefore they shall experience the same .

NO deed or thought or words are created without causing a corresponding affect.....(karma)

All this is taking place and God is not lifting one finger.

Karma is a power unto itself and operates outside of Gods involement.

Stop blaming God for all your suffering.

And stop doing the wrong thing.

Originally posted by sonhouse
There are obvious falsehoods in that tome: One of them calling evolution a hypothesis. It has progressed WAY past mere hypothesis to all but proven, the all but being creationists of course. The second one is the first major argument: That evolution is only believed by unbelievers. That is totally not true. Many religious people now accept the overwhelming ...[text shortened]... eves in the christian god but believes god set up the universe to use evolution to make mankind.

There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Information means intelligence.

There are zero missing links.

Originally posted by Dasa
There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Information means intelligence.

There are zero missing links.

All that lack of evidence is only in your mind. In the real world it is a fact. The only reason you cannot accept evolution as proven is the ax you have to grind about religion. You have zero intellectual credibility because you are not intellectually honest. Intellectual honesty is where you present a case but are not doing it to advance a cause but to learn the truth. You are not intellectually honest with anyone here because you have an agenda. People with an agenda in scientific work are automatically not intellectually honest because their mind is set in advance and any work done will be 'adjusted' to produce the results they claim. You are intellectually dishonest in the extreme because you can't even LOOK at refutations about evolution due to your extreme closed mind. If your mind was open you could look at data about evolution, perhaps actually read books about it and then work to disprove it. Your actions are not even close to that reality. Your actions are to refute the data based on your being brainwashed by ancient so-called knowledge.

Therefore you are in fact intellectually dishonest in the most extreme. I am sorry for what is left of your mind.

Originally posted by Dasa
You do not listen.

Karma is responsible for the affect.

Your deeds and thoughts and words are responsible for the cause.

You create the circumstances of your life for the present life and for the next life.

Say for instance you work in a slaughter house killing cows for money.

The cows are suffering in cruel conditions.

You are the cause.

W ...[text shortened]... Gods involement.

Stop blaming God for all your suffering.

And stop doing the wrong thing.

If you wash your hands with soap arterf going to the Loo will you come back as virus or bacteria?

Originally posted by Dasa
You do not listen.

Karma is responsible for the affect.

Your deeds and thoughts and words are responsible for the cause.

You create the circumstances of your life for the present life and for the next life.

Say for instance you work in a slaughter house killing cows for money.

The cows are suffering in cruel conditions.

You are the cause.

W ...[text shortened]... Gods involement.

Stop blaming God for all your suffering.

And stop doing the wrong thing.

What did all those animals eat
if they didn't hunt each other ?


Are you trying to say they were all vegetarians?

If so would then a tiger not come back as a field of grass?

Originally posted by johnnylongwoody
What did all those animals eat
if they didn't hunt each other ?


Are you trying to say they were all vegetarians?

If so would then a tiger not come back as a field of grass?

Surely not the whole field🙂 Wouldn't leave room for all the OTHER tigers.....

Originally posted by Dasa
There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Information means intelligence.

There are zero missing links.

There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Indeed that is true. There is not ONE piece of evidence that supports evolution...

There are billions.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Evolution by natural selection.

Information means intelligence.

Wrong. Go back to remedial science classes and try again.

There are zero missing links.

Yep. No missing links... Cos we found them.

(actually not totally true, but the joke was too hard to resist and the idea of missing links
requires totally misunderstanding evolution anyway.)

Originally posted by googlefudge

There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Indeed that is true. There is not ONE piece of evidence that supports evolution...

There are billions.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Evolution by natural selection.

Information means intelligence.

Wrong. ...[text shortened]... d to resist and the idea of missing links
requires totally misunderstanding evolution anyway.)

Speaking of missing links, here is one such just uncovered that complicates the issue of birds having evolved from dinosaurs:

http://scitechdaily.com/discovery-of-bird-dinosaur-eosinopteryx-challenges-bird-evolution-theory/

Originally posted by sonhouse
So answer me this: Take a look at this article and then comment:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-immune-foiled-hairpin.html

So your god created all of us in a wave of its metaphorical hand. How do you explain these organisms that attack gods creation? Why would a god invent humans and animals and such but then create life forms that attacks the very life your god supposedly created?

It is because after the flood everything changed. There were no snakes for example that had vinom that was bad.

Originally posted by sonhouse
So answer me this: Take a look at this article and then comment:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-01-immune-foiled-hairpin.html

So your god created all of us in a wave of its metaphorical hand. How do you explain these organisms that attack gods creation? Why would a god invent humans and animals and such but then create life forms that attacks the very life your god supposedly created?

Creation was cursed at the fall, a great deal of negative change occured there.
Kelly

Originally posted by OdBod
Do you think the structure of DNA can change Mr RJHinds?

Are you one of those that believes this new definition of evolution to be just any change? Everything but God can change. But adaptation or a change of any type is not the orignal meaning of the word, "evolution" in the theory of evolution. The original meaning of evolution was a progressive change from the most simple to the most complex and advanced life forms, and it assumes the development of life from non-life, even though that assumption has already been proven false, by the law of biogenesis.

Originally posted by googlefudge

There is not one piece of evidence that supports evolution.

Indeed that is true. There is not ONE piece of evidence that supports evolution...

There are billions.

Where does all the information come from in a living cell.

Evolution by natural selection.

Information means intelligence.

Wrong. ...[text shortened]... d to resist and the idea of missing links
requires totally misunderstanding evolution anyway.)

You making declarative false statements does not make them true Mr. Magoo Fudge. 😏