Originally posted by josephwWell as I have explained, I don't think it is "God's opinion", and this is coming from someone who gave it a chance for 28 years. Do you really just not understand what I have been saying to you on this thread?
Why should FMF read the Bible. After all, it's only God's opinion.
Originally posted by FMFI think I do understand what you've been saying. I just don't think you do.
Well as I have explained, I don't think it is "God's opinion", and this is coming from someone who gave it a chance for 28 years. Do you really just not understand what I have been saying to you on this thread?
We're not debating about opinions here. You deny the authorship of the scriptures in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are inspired by God. That is something to debate about, but all you do is repeatedly state your opinion that you do not recognise the authority of the Bible. Fine. Then at least admit that it is only your opinion that the Bible isn't the word of God unless you can produce evidence to back it up.
I'm not here to prove that josehw's word is true. My opinion means nothing. I appeal to the authority of God's Word. You only have your word to appeal to, hence it is merely your opinion. You are not the creator of life. You have no authority on the subject.
",..and this is coming from someone who gave it a chance for 28 years."
Try to understand this. You need to invert your thinking. It isn't about you giving "it" a chance. It's about God giving you a chance.
This is why I say I don't think you understand what you're saying. Dig deep into your soul and see if you can grasp what this verse means.
Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths.
It's all or nothing. Total dependency. Absolute trust. Death of self. Peace.
Originally posted by josephwYes we are "debating about opinions here". Your opinion is that the bible contains 'God's instructions'. My opinion is that it doesn't. And while you may be of the opinion that there is "overwhelming evidence that [the bible] inspired by God", I am not.
We're not debating about opinions here. You deny the authorship of the scriptures in the face of overwhelming evidence that they are inspired by God.
Originally posted by josephwI understand only too well what you are saying. I don't accept any of the assertions you are making about God and about what He is doing and what "it" is and isn't about.
Try to understand this. You need to invert your thinking. It isn't about [b]you giving "it" a chance. It's about God giving you a chance.[/b]
Originally posted by FMFThen one of us is wrong. Right?
Yes we are "debating about opinions here". Your opinion is that the bible contains 'God's instructions'. My opinion is that it doesn't. And while you may be of the opinion that there is "overwhelming evidence that [the bible] inspired by God", I am not.
An amazing thing it is.
Originally posted by josephwI would say that that is pretty much ALL you're trying to do here.
I'm not here to prove that josehw's word is true.
My opinion means nothing.
It certainly means nothing to me in spiritual terms but I'm always interested in trading opinions on this web site.
I appeal to the authority of God's Word.
So you say. That you claim some "authority" doesn't really affect me and does not affect the validity of what you say.
You are not the creator of life. You have no authority on the subject.
I do not claim to be the creator of life. You claiming to have some sort of indirect "authority" is a matter for you. I do not claim to be an "authority".
Originally posted by josephwWhy must "one of us" be wrong? You may see this as some kind of either/or competition, but I don't. I don't really care about what you think is going to happen to you when you die. I don't really care if you're wrong or if you're right. All I am saying is that I have absolutely no objective reason whatsoever to think you're "right". I have absolutely no objective reason to think anything other than we are going to both meet the same fate, which is that we die. Your speculation about what happens after your death has no bearing at all on my reality.
Then one of us is wrong. Right?
Originally posted by josephwThis recipe for a 'spiritual life' may work for you. You might even gird your loins with stuff like "It's all or nothing". But it doesn't work for me. And I don't have any reason to look upon my 'spiritual life' as "nothing" as you suggest. In fact, you framing it like this, makes me less able to take your judgement and perception seriously, on either a spiritual level or an intellectual level. It just comes across as rote, cant, mantra, sterile.
It's all or nothing. Total dependency. Absolute trust. Death of self. Peace.
Originally posted by FMFBut you do claim to be the authority when you say you do not recognise the authority of God's Word. If it is only your word you recognise, then that makes you the authority.
I would say that that is pretty much ALL you're trying to do here.
[b]My opinion means nothing.
It certainly means nothing to me in spiritual terms but I'm always interested in trading opinions on this web site.
I appeal to the authority of God's Word.
So you say. That you claim some "authority" doesn't really affect me and does not aff ...[text shortened]... sort of indirect "authority" is a matter for you. I do not claim to be an "authority".[/b]
My words are merely my attempt to reason out this discussion. Nothing in and of myself is going to be sufficient to convince you of anything. You have to look inside your own heart and see if you hear the Word of God. Because without it there is no life.
It is only reasonable to conclude that without God there is no life.
Originally posted by josephwI do not claim to be an authority. The word "authority", by its very definition, refers to the power or right to give orders or make decisions over others. I do not claim to have authority over anyone in spiritual matters. I know that you do, but that does not mean that I do.
But you do claim to be the authority when you say you do not recognise the authority of God's Word. If it is only your word you recognise, then that makes you the authority.
Originally posted by josephwIn the bible? I don't hear "the Word of God". I don't think you do either. I realize that you're certain that you do.
You have to look inside your own heart and see if you hear the Word of God.
Because without it there is no life.
So you say. What does this have to do with "society" and "end times" and "eternal torment" or "burning in hell"?
Originally posted by FMFWell, it's not as if you never heard about it. How that Jesus died on the cross for our sins and rose from the dead. If it's true, and you didn't believe it, who would you have to blame?
In the bible? I don't hear "the Word of God". I don't think you do either. I realize that you're certain that you do.
[b]Because without it there is no life.
So you say. What does this have to do with "society" and "end times" and "eternal torment" or "burning in hell"?[/b]
What? Do you need a sign?
Originally posted by FMF[/b]And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.”
I do not claim to be an authority. The word "authority", by its very definition, refers to the power or right to give orders or make decisions over others. I do not claim to have authority over anyone in spiritual matters. I know that you do, but that does not mean that I do.
(Mathew 28:18-20 NKJV)
Jesus the Christ is one that does claim to have "all authority in Heaven and Earth.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! 😏