1. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    06 Apr '16 22:13
    http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
  2. Joined
    16 Jan '07
    Moves
    93531
    06 Apr '16 22:32
    Originally posted by josephw
    http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
    neither is drinking alcohol or eating fatty foods.........doesnt stop it being fun though.
  3. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    The Advanced Mind
    bigdogghouse.com/RHP
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    110904
    07 Apr '16 02:00
    Most red-blooded straight 'mericans are happy to condemn sodomy until they realize they can't even get blow-jobs from their wife under that prohibition.
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    07 Apr '16 03:19
    Just look up STD and AIDS cases when it comes to gay men in the US. They account for well over 60% of new cases every year, even though they are less than 10% of the population.

    Dims don't care.

    Now which Dim city will be next to ban biggie sodas do you reckon?
  5. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    07 Apr '16 03:52
    Originally posted by whodey
    Now which Dim city will be next to ban biggie sodas do you reckon?
    Do you want "Dim" cities to ban gay men?
  6. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3081
    07 Apr '16 06:30
    Originally posted by FMF
    Do you want "Dim" cities to ban gay men?
    Obesity rates among gay men are far lower than among heterosexual men. Perhaps whodey's point is that more people should be gay to avoid the dangers of obesity, which are far greater than HIV/AIDS.
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    07 Apr '16 07:171 edit
    Originally posted by josephw
    http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm
    http://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/adolescents-youngadults.htm
    From the same website:
    "15-24 year olds account for nearly half of all new STD infections"

    Sex before you are 25 ain't healthy.

    Oh, wait. That means the other half are over 25!

    Sex in general ain't healthy.

    Do you have sex josephw? You have heard of STD's right? They are diseases that are spread specifically by having sex. They are some of the most deadly diseases on the planet. Many of my heterosexual friends have died from AIDS (yes, here in Africa, AIDS is very real). Here in Africa more people die from heterosexual sex than from car crashes.

    And do you want to know how many people have died because stupid american evangelists come to Africa and stop people from using condoms? Going near american evangelists ain't healthy. Seriously it can kill you.
  8. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    07 Apr '16 10:12
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    http://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/adolescents-youngadults.htm
    From the same website:
    "15-24 year olds account for nearly half of all new STD infections"

    Sex before you are 25 ain't healthy.

    Oh, wait. That means the other half are over 25!

    Sex in general ain't healthy.

    Do you have sex josephw? You have heard of STD's right? They ...[text shortened]... le from using condoms? Going near american evangelists ain't healthy. Seriously it can kill you.
    Then I guess you'd have no problem with the concept of monogamy as proscribed by our creator. Sex between one man and one woman for life. That would effectively solve the entire problem of sexually transmitted diseases wouldn't it smart guy?
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    07 Apr '16 10:211 edit
    Originally posted by josephw
    Then I guess you'd have no problem with the concept of monogamy as proscribed by our creator. Sex between one man and one woman for life. That would effectively solve the entire problem of sexually transmitted diseases wouldn't it smart guy?
    Yes, it would. Sadly humans are not monogamistic. I wonder why the creator did that?
    Another slight problem is that if you get divorced, remaining monogamistic essentially means no more sex for the rest of your life. I guess your creator didn't think about that one either. Much smarter would have been to not create all those nasty STD's.
    I must also point out that monogamistic sodomy is also STD free.
  10. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    07 Apr '16 10:23
    Originally posted by josephw
    Then I guess you'd have no problem with the concept of monogamy as proscribed by our creator.
    What do you mean by "proscribed"?
  11. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    07 Apr '16 10:243 edits
    Originally posted by FMF
    Do you want "Dim" cities to ban gay men?
    Banning things is more of a Dim policy, however, it would help for the state to not endorse gay sex via marriage. There is nothing like a President who calls people up and congratulates them for coming out of the closet and then lights up the White House like a rainbow at night. And there is nothing like a country that refuses to bake a cake with a Confederate flag on it but then sues those who refuse to bake a gay cake.

    But alas, the left wants us to embrace gay sex and promote it no matter the dangers to society. Maybe someday we will be like Sparta where all men engage in it. Those who refuse will be labeled hatemongers and bigots.
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    07 Apr '16 10:27
    Originally posted by whodey
    Banning things is more of a Dim policy, however, it would help for the state to not endorse gay sex via marriage.
    States to not 'endorse gay sex via marriage'. They merely allow gay marriage. In addition, as josephw points out, when it comes to STDs marriage is actually better than just sleeping around willy nilly.
  13. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    07 Apr '16 10:30
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    States to not 'endorse gay sex via marriage'. They merely allow gay marriage. In addition, as josephw points out, when it comes to STDs marriage is actually better than just sleeping around willy nilly.
    Marriage is a "right" with state perks. Marriage also elevates a particular sexual practice by the state endorsing it. Why the state is involved in elevating sexual conduct remains a mystery to me. Originally I thought it was designed to promote larger families, but today having babies is seen as destructive to mother earth so now gay sex is all the rage.
  14. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    07 Apr '16 10:34
    Originally posted by whodey
    Banning things is more of a Dim policy, however, it would help for the state to not endorse gay sex via marriage. There is nothing like a President who calls people up and congratulates them for coming out of the closet and then lights up the White House like a rainbow at night. And there is nothing like a country that refuses to bake a cake with a Confeder ...[text shortened]... ike Sparta where all men engage in it. Those who refuse will be labeled hatemongers and bigots.
    It's good that gay people can get married and it's good that the government recognizes it. If you don't want to be gay, whodey, then don't be gay. If you don't want to "embrace gay sex", then don't "embrace gay sex".
  15. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    07 Apr '16 10:37
    Originally posted by whodey
    Marriage is a "right" with state perks. Marriage also elevates a particular sexual practice by the state endorsing it. Why the state is involved in elevating sexual conduct remains a mystery to me. Originally I thought it was designed to promote larger families, but today having babies is seen as destructive to mother earth so now gay sex is all the rage.
    There's nothing wrong with the legal status, along with rights and responsibilities, of people who have entered into a marriage, regardless of their gender, clearly laid out and recognized. Why should what you personally feel about "a particular sexual practice" impinge upon gay people?
Back to Top