Sperm

-Removed-

Well I don't imagine any all convincing answers on these questions.

I see sperm as like little dumb tadpoles, but incomplete. I guess each individual sperm represents a potential , and so it acts like a 'potential'.
Squirming,trying,... errr, anyone else?

-Removed-

It moves.

Doesn't really reproduce - I mean it doesn't produce more sperm!

It doesn't eat.

But it is involved in an evolutionary arms race!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_competition

-Removed-

In my opinion the sperm is just as much a living thing as the egg, the lung, the heart, and the liver. But it is not a living soul or person.

-Removed-

A sperm is a living cell. As wolfgang59 points out it doesn't quite technically fit our simplified definition of life as typically used in biology. Its an exception to the rule.
Skin cells are a better fit for the biological definition.

But how did you go from 'moves with purpose' and 'reproduces' to 'its sacred'? You don't give much thought to all the bacteria that die in your gut every single day, why should you give thought to sperm cells dying. Both are living things.

For you question to make any sense at all, you should have asked 'is a sperm a human being?', or 'does a sperm have a soul?'.

The Catholic beliefs come straight out of the Bible.

Originally posted by twhitehead

But how did you go from 'moves with purpose' and 'reproduces' to 'its sacred'?
........................................................................
The Catholic beliefs come straight out of the Bible.

don't actually think that is dive's pov.

Here is the MontyPython sketch from The Meaning Of Life

YouTube

Originally posted by wolfgang59
don't actually think that is dive's pov.

I am not sure what his POV is, but he certainly seems to be trying to make a connection between the biological definition of life, and the morality of human life - when they are not the same thing at all. The Biological definition of life mostly applies at the cellular level and not at the level of the organism.

I think a much more interesting question in this area is whether or not identical twins are technically the same person.

Suppose you believe that 'every sperm is sacred' and every sperm represents a human life. Suppose there is one sperm which gives rise to identical twins. Suppose then that one twin dies. Is the 'human life' now half dead? Can one of the twins go to heaven and the other to hell?
What about cloning?

Here is the MontyPython sketch from The Meaning Of Life
YouTube
Yes, I have seen it many times. It is well done.

-Removed-

Life as a loooooong spiritual pregnancy. I like that. And just like the sperm has no idea where it's going or why, because it has no brain to think with, so do we lack the organ necessary to perceive our spiritual destination, or why we're going there. Brilliant. I'm a spiritual sperm.

Get out of my way you twat! I'm first. 😠

-Removed-

Actually no, there is no special distinction about the ones that make it to fertilization. The only distinction is the ones that make it to adulthood and successfully produce new sperm and get involved in mating.
At the present time, the majority of fertilized eggs, do not make it to birth. In the recent past, the majority of births did not make it to reproduction age. An even today, a significant proportion of those who get to reproduction age, do not reproduce, although I don't know the exact statistics, it is probably about 50%.

However all the sperm which don't make it are all potential "new creations" themselves, all those potential people lost forever.
With the advent of cloning, every cell in your body is a potential 'new creation' depending on how you measure potential.

Let me be explicit. Consider the human race and god - is there a parallel here? The bible talks about the fusion of gods spirit and man becoming a new creation", similarly only a few make it.

I'm just pondering.
Looking for parallels and patterns is not always a useful exercise and can often lead to wrong conclusions.
High mortality rates do however call into question some of the fundamental tenets of most religions.

-Removed-

We are expecting more to make it in the future

-Removed-

Wait, I just realised. Given how calm everything is, you don't suppose we're still in god's balls, do you? To be thrust out in a violent burst?

I really hope he doesn't masturbate much. I'd like to think there's at least a chance (however slim) I'll make it to the spiritual egg. 😕

-Removed-

I would feel that it is just as unfair as life. I suspect that you are trying to claim the opposite, but I could be wrong.
In my opinion, the fact that the vast majority of human beings die in childhood or before, a religion that grants rewards to a subset of those that reach adulthood seems to be remarkably unfair.
Similarly, a religion that grants rewards to those that die as children, yet denies these rewards to some of those that reach adulthood, is also unfair.
Essentially the death of children goes against the central theme of most religions.
I can fully understand how evolution discards those that do not make it. I cannot understand how a God that values each individual being would discard some individuals.

What do you hope to understand from the analogy?

Originally posted by twhitehead
I would feel that it is just as unfair as life. I suspect that you are trying to claim the opposite, but I could be wrong.
In my opinion, the fact that the vast majority of human beings die in childhood or before, a religion that grants rewards to a subset of those that reach adulthood seems to be remarkably unfair.
Similarly, a religion that grants rew ...[text shortened]... vidual being would discard some individuals.

What do you hope to understand from the analogy?

You are not required to understand, but only to accept and believe in the One that does understand.

HalleluYah !!! Praise the LORD! Holy! Holy! Holy!