Right. So now anyone who is not a member of your cult will recognize that you've basically admitted to my claim.
What is your claim? I forgot.
Well, once you've really read the book you put so much faith in, you'll know what I'm referring to.
No I wouldn't, because it's an incomplete sentence. Check it out again and try to string together something intelligable, please.
I was thinking of these 2 defintions. Both fit the bill.
a system of religious beliefs and ritual; also : its body of adherents
a religion regarded as unorthodox or spurious; also : its body of adherents
from Merriam - Webster
Then I suppose it fits the denotation, but surely not the connotation.
The accounts in the four gospels of the resurrection and the proceeding events are so riddled with what we may call for now surface anamolies that you must come up with a ridiculous story to account for all the claims while not adding anything superfluous. Of course, this should be expected from material written half a century after the event by people who weren't even there!
Or...you could look to other parts of the Bible to explain it. Or think of it in terms of 1st century Christians, since that's who it was written to. They would know things you didn't.
This is like that other crap about admitting that Jesus was a real person. Rash stupidity. Obviously, at the time I was quite convinced that I had a spirit that it had been redeemed by Christ through his precious blood on the cross and his mighty resurrection which took the keys of hell from Satan. Now I do not believe those things. That's what happens when you emerge from a cult. You realize that what you thought was real was a bunch of crap. It's really very easy to understand. If you made half the effort understanding others as you do upholding your narrow view of the bible, you'd have gotten it.
Again, you're assuming you know everything. Arrogant and stupid, to say the least. I just claim to know God.
Remember I was quite well-versed in your cult. You are clearly not well versed in reason or science. Try checking out the view from the other side.
Wow, degenerating to calling me stupid again? What's happening, tel? Anyway, I'm taking science, have studied it, and I find myself to be quite reasonable. I would need proof of irrationality before I consider that suggestion.
Study statistics sometime, then you'll care about polls. Walking up to some one and acting like a jackass is no way to get a decent observation. Better stick to literature. Actually, better step down to accounting.
How would declaring your faith to a "fellow Christian" be considered acting like a jackass? If they were truly a Christian, they would rejoice and agree. Polls mean squat. Polls said John Kerry would win the election. Oops.
Not your atheist family I hope?
I was referring to my Christian brothers and sisters. Though I do trust my atheist family, because they love me in spite of lacking Christ. It's not as deep a love, but it exists. I trust atheists, too, for the most part. I give people the benefit of the doubt.
Hey just keep wearing those rose-colored glasses.
Ok, keep wearing that blindfold.
Brilliant!
Oh and by the way.
concise
1 : marked by brevity of expression or statement : free from all elaboration and superfluous detail
2 : cut short
Merriam-Webster
How is coherency superfluous? It's rather important to know that X means Christ, and not everyone has studied it.