Originally posted by sonshipSo, basically because other people are sceptical, you are also sceptical?
Watch the video - the secular video that I linked to.
Here's the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji2cvuJ1mYg
I have to note that at no point in that video is any actual scientific reason given why soft tissue could not survive a long time. All that is given is a lot of people expressing scepticism.
Originally posted by SuzianneEspecially considering they have found fossils with teeth marks matching that from T Rex.
My point is that of course T Rex was a carnivore.
Is the point of your question the "created" part?
You know what I think about arguing over this. Both sides are right.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to just look at the teeth to see they were carnivorous. Those teeth were not meant to grind pinapples.
Originally posted by sonhouseRecall seeing a headline not too long ago that claimed T Rex was a herbivore.
Especially considering they have found fossils with teeth marks matching that from T Rex.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to just look at the teeth to see they were carnivorous. Those teeth were not meant to grind pinapples.
Not sure what such a strange claim was based on. As you say, its teeth alone would suggest it liked to get stuck in to other dinosaurs.
-Removed-I am fairly sure Suzianne is not a young earth creationist. Most young earth creationists believe that lions were vegetarian once - but for other reasons.
I don't see why the T-Rex couldn't have lived at the time of Adam and Eve but have been on a different content. Would you expect a young earth creationist to paint Adam and Eve with every species on earth past and present in a garden sized area? Or are you confusing it with Noah's ark?