Originally posted by divegeesterIt contained some reasons of why I don't think so, if you had actually read it you may have noticed.
So the link you posted at me was of no use whatsoever and just a massive prehistoric red herring by you to deflect?
In case you missed it the first time, why do you ask?
Originally posted by FetchmyjunkThen why not just say "no" instead of all this obfuscation. Im not interested in what other people think I'm interested in what you think.
It contained some reasons of why I don't think so, if you had actually read it you may have noticed.
In case you missed it the first time, why do you ask?
I'm interested in what you think about dinosaurs and how they were created.
Originally posted by SuzianneTo have a discussion on the understanding and/or beliefs of the creationist posters in this forum as to whether or not T Rex was created as a carnivore or not.
Can I ask, what exactly is the point of this question?
So, what do you think created carnivore, or not?
Originally posted by divegeesterMy point is that of course T Rex was a carnivore.
To have a discussion on the understanding and/or beliefs of the creationist posters in this forum as to whether or not T Rex was created as a carnivore or not.
So, what do you think created carnivore, or not?
Is the point of your question the "created" part?
You know what I think about arguing over this. Both sides are right.
Originally posted by sonshipSo, basically because other people are sceptical, you are also sceptical?
Watch the video - the secular video that I linked to.
Here's the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ji2cvuJ1mYg
I have to note that at no point in that video is any actual scientific reason given why soft tissue could not survive a long time. All that is given is a lot of people expressing scepticism.
25 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneEspecially considering they have found fossils with teeth marks matching that from T Rex.
My point is that of course T Rex was a carnivore.
Is the point of your question the "created" part?
You know what I think about arguing over this. Both sides are right.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to just look at the teeth to see they were carnivorous. Those teeth were not meant to grind pinapples.
Originally posted by SuzianneIt's not an "argument".
My point is that of course T Rex was a carnivore.
Is the point of your question the "created" part?
You know what I think about arguing over this. Both sides are right.
So your position on T Rex is that it was created by God as a meat-eater from day one in the garden of Eden...?
I don't see many paintings of Adam & Eve being chased through paradise by a 15 meter dinosaur with 6 inch teeth. π
Originally posted by sonhouseRecall seeing a headline not too long ago that claimed T Rex was a herbivore.
Especially considering they have found fossils with teeth marks matching that from T Rex.
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to just look at the teeth to see they were carnivorous. Those teeth were not meant to grind pinapples.
Not sure what such a strange claim was based on. As you say, its teeth alone would suggest it liked to get stuck in to other dinosaurs.
26 Jul 16
Originally posted by divegeesterI am fairly sure Suzianne is not a young earth creationist. Most young earth creationists believe that lions were vegetarian once - but for other reasons.
It's not an "argument".
So your position on T Rex is that it was created by God as a meat-eater from day one in the garden of Eden...?
I don't see many paintings of Adam & Eve being chased through paradise by a 15 meter dinosaur with 6 inch teeth. π
I don't see why the T-Rex couldn't have lived at the time of Adam and Eve but have been on a different content. Would you expect a young earth creationist to paint Adam and Eve with every species on earth past and present in a garden sized area? Or are you confusing it with Noah's ark?