Go back
Taking Quality Questions on Revelation

Taking Quality Questions on Revelation

Spirituality


Originally posted by @sonship
From what I have seen in the last few years, even floaters of the theory hedge so as not to be TOO definite about it. Probably some debunking has caused them to be a tad less committed.


Like Dr. Richard Carrier.
Dr. Richard Carrier doesn't post on this forum.


Originally posted by @fmf
Dr. Richard Carrier doesn't post on this forum.
Are you trying to give the impression that you have an important point?


Originally posted by @sonship
Are you trying to give the impression that you have an important point?
Nobody here thinks Jesus didn't exist. So what is the important point you are making by raising the question "Did Jesus exist?"

Vote Up
Vote Down

More profitable time spent suggestion:

Craig Evans vs. Richard Carrier - Did Jesus Exist?


Originally posted by @sonship to divegeester
Along with these you should also take to confessing to the Lord Jesus your tendency to want to insert words into the mouths of Christians with whom you have disagreements.
And this... Do you perceive 'offences' committed against you in debates and discussions here are also 'offences' committed against Jesus?


Originally posted by @fmf
And this... Do you perceive 'offences' committed against you in debates and discussions here are also 'offences' committed against Jesus?
Are you trying to give the impression that you have an important point?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @sonship
More profitable time spent suggestion:

[b] Craig Evans vs. Richard Carrier - Did Jesus Exist?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLMSS_DMVK4[/b]
Good debate. Watching it now.

Maybe some here are "headed in that direction" ie. "Jesus never existed?"

Preemption is allowed here.


Originally posted by @sonship
Are you trying to give the impression that you have an important point?
On the previous page you quite clearly suggested that in the course of disagreeing with you the poster somehow commits 'offences' against you that you equate with 'offences' against Jesus for which you urge him to "confess" to Jesus. If you didn't think you were making 'an important point' why did you choose to introduce such a peculiar bit of vanity into this thread?


Originally posted by @fmf
On the previous page you quite clearly suggested that in the course of disagreeing with you the poster somehow commits 'offences' against you that you equate with 'offences' against Jesus for which you urge him to "confess" to Jesus. If you didn't think you were making 'an important point' why did you choose to introduce such a peculiar bit of vanity into this thread?
Vanity indeed 😀

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
Nobody here thinks Jesus didn't exist. So what is the important point you are making by raising the question "Did Jesus exist?"
Oh, you know - "Nobody here" thinks thus and such?

How do you know what everyone who reads these posts thinks?

What arrogance.


Originally posted by @sonship
Oh, you know - "Nobody here" thinks thus and such?

How do you know what everyone who reads these posts thinks?

What arrogance.
You have taken to lecturing mythicist atheists that you have no reason to believe reside here? You are seeking to draw them out of their non-posting silence and engage you in discussion with the aid of your confirmation bias YouTube clips? You appear to be posting for the sake of posting, sonship. What vanity.

Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by @fmf
On the previous page you quite clearly suggested that in the course of disagreeing with you the poster somehow commits 'offences' against you that you equate with 'offences' against Jesus for which you urge him to "confess" to Jesus. If you didn't think you were making 'an important point' why did you choose to introduce such a peculiar bit of vanity into this thread?
Come on, Kiddo. Enough. Go outside and get some fresh air.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @fmf
You have taken to lecturing mythicist atheists that you have no reason to believe reside here? You are seeking to draw them out of their non-posting silence and engage you in discussion with the aid of your confirmation bias YouTube clips? You appear to be posting for the sake of posting, sonship. What vanity.
What projection.
What "Takes one to know one."

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Or, in other words, “o. Ant be bothered to explain.


No, I'm being quite honest.
Putting words in people's mouth by saying "in other words".