27 Jan '13 06:53>
Originally posted by FMFI accept when we vote for who we want, we will live with the results good or
Well if you're happy to accept the results of elections then that makes you a supporter of democracy then, I suppose.
bad.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJayI believe we already tried the flat tax and it failed. So how about the FairTax?
I advocate a flat tax.
Kelly
Originally posted by robbie carrobiePlease go back and read my post of 26 Jan 17:03! You seem utterly incapable of answering the question . I think your reticence in addressing the question is because you know where it is going!
I am still waiting for you to produce a single specimen of transmutation. You produced, bacteria which adapts and does not transmute to anything other than bacteria, your assertion therefore of stating that a theist avoids scientific discussion is quite simply simply put, ludicrous and is rather reminiscent of the completely unfounded assertions those who have limited their search for truth to unintelligent agencies are want to make.
Originally posted by RJHindsA flat tax isn't complicated it is the simplest there is, if you earn 100 and 10%
I believe we already tried the flat tax and it failed. So how about the FairTax?
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/taxes/a/aafairtax.htm
http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer?pagename=HowFairTaxWorks
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax
P.S. The Flat tax is too complicated and we want to get away from complicated.
Originally posted by KellyJayWell, if you want to put a lot of people in poverty by a flat tax without adjustments for those that have more children and are only making minimum wages, then it would be simple, but definitely not fair. Also income that is not reported is not taxed. Too much opportunity to cheat.
A flat tax isn't complicated it is the simplest there is, if you earn 100 and 10%
is the tax you pay 10 no fuse no muss, you make a 1000 you pay 100, and
so on. It only gets complex when people want to tinker with it to make it more
fair than it already is. Which brings us back into the, it isn't an income tax it is
a punishment tax.
Kelly
Originally posted by Proper Knobdomesticated is a generic term for animals such as cows, chickens etc, the fact that they appeared before man is what? should they be termed wild chickens?
Not domesticated ones, not in the slightest. Are you going to argue that domesticated dogs came before humans?
Originally posted by OdBodI also see that you are unable to provide a single reference of a species (genus) that has transmutated into another, i will refrain from making references to your personality, I would be pleased if you did the same. I have read your posts once and it was quite enough. You have failed to produce a single species which has transmutated and your hypothesis therefore remains just that, a hypothesis. Citing adaptation is not proof of transmutation.
Please go back and read my post of 26 Jan 17:03! You seem utterly incapable of answering the question . I think your reticence in addressing the question is because you know where it is going!
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAll chickes were wild before they came under the control of man. There as some still wild today. I am not aware that Genesis states that God created domesticated animals. God gave us dominion over all animals, but it was up to us to domesticate the ones we could.
domesticated is a generic term for animals such as cows, chickens etc, the fact that they appeared before man is what? should they be termed wild chickens?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieDomesticated means that artificial selection has been carried out by humans. The course of these animals genetic history has been shaped by mankind, we have bred them to meet our needs. That is what domesticated means.
domesticated is a generic term for animals such as cows, chickens etc, the fact that they appeared before man is what? should they be termed wild chickens?