@ghost-of-a-duke saidMotivational mongering, your a mind reader now! You can not accept my answers, but you are confident you know why I have said the things I did! You are fitting in well with this group that shares this ability of telling someone what they are really saying when they deny it.
Underpinned clearly by a desire not to criticize sonship.
@kellyjay saidI have never heard you once criticize sonship for "motivation mongering" - a gimmick he uses ad nauseam to deflect on-topic comments. Not once. I wonder what your motivation is for not doing so?
Motivational mongering, your a mind reader now! You can not accept my answers, but you are confident you know why I have said the things I did! You are fitting in well with this group that shares this ability of telling someone what they are really saying when they deny it.
1 edit
@kellyjay saidYour contributions to this thread have been disappointing. Again, I don't think you even bothered to read the OP.
Motivational mongering, your a mind reader now! You can not accept my answers, but you are confident you know why I have said the things I did! You are fitting in well with this group that shares this ability of telling someone what they are really saying when they deny it.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThat a new rule you must start at the beginning and not say anything until you read the whole thing? Why didn’t Russ provide the Duke rules of posting? You have rules and excuses I mean exceptions.
Your contributions to this thread have been disappointing. Again, I don't think you even bothered to read the OP.
@kellyjay saidIf you come into a thread your first post at least should try and be on topic. If it goes off on a tangent later, fair enough. But to not address the OP and say your focus is elsewhere is just silly.
That a new rule you must start at the beginning and not say anything until you read the whole thing? Why didn’t Russ provide the Duke rules of posting? You have rules and excuses I mean exceptions.
If your focus is elsewhere, post elsewhere. (Or just grow a pair and say clearly that nobody is above plagiarism).
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI don’t need or desire you telling me what I should and should not say here!
If you come into a thread your first post at least should try and be on topic. If it goes off on a tangent later, fair enough. But to not address the OP and say your focus is elsewhere is just silly.
If your focus is elsewhere, post elsewhere. (Or just grow a pair and say clearly that nobody is above plagiarism).
@kellyjay saidGeneral courtesy and forum etiquette. As a long term poster, you should know this already.
I don’t need or desire you telling me what I should and should not say here!
Would you come into a thread about Judaism and immediately start talking about rugby?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWould you jump in thread about one poster and make it about another?
General courtesy and forum etiquette. As a long term poster, you should know this already.
Would you come into a thread about Judaism and immediately start talking about rugby?
@kellyjay saidThis has not been a good day for you.
Would you jump in thread about one poster and make it about another?
Have a good night's sleep and then pop in tomorrow to tender your apology and perhaps address the OP of the thread.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf not are you going to round up a posse deputize them and harass me a little more, telling me about how bad my posting habits are according to you?
This has not been a good day for you.
Have a good night's sleep and then pop in tomorrow to tender your apology and perhaps address the OP of the thread.
@kellyjay saidIf required.
If not are you going to round up a posse deputize them and harass me a little more, telling me about how bad my posting habits are according to you?