Originally posted by dj2beckerI probably already have told you,, ift aint my fault that you have a poor memory.
[b]That does not equate to your definition of " faith ", as you have shown time and time again in your posts.
How is your faith any different to mine?
Oh yea, now I remember your faith is based on evidence... When you were trying to replicate the big bang and blew up the lav... So you concluded that it must have happened...
...[text shortened]... matters.
What evidence do you have for the big bang? Some cherry bomb that blew up a lav?[/b]
I do not have any time to waste trying to teach you anything anyway.
btw you have no evidence that God exist ,,none at all.
I do , but I'm not letting you in on it.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageYea, I suppose the idea that all the continents in the world are floating around on the sea like some blocks of ice in a bath tub is more believable than the idea that all the matter in the universe was squished into a dot the size of a period on a page.
Out of curiosity...do you find the idea of continental drift more credible than the Big Bang?
Edit: Get behind me, smileys.
edit: but I suppose the idea that this dot exploded and created everything we have today simply takes the cake.
Originally posted by MetamorphosisWe are busy on #2 ,,unlike the fundies who only read the bible ( see my previous post) ,, and are expanding Ekpyrotics in to a Cyclic universe.
Well, the "heavens may pass away" but there won't be any [b]great noise as sound does not propagate in vacuum. For us, all is silent in space.
As for the Big Bang, I see it as science's version of the Creation event of monotheistic religions. But for the record I don't believe existence "began" with a Big Bang anymore than it did with Go ...[text shortened]... at everything must have a beginning, somewhere. But there is something deeply absurd about this.[/b]
There is also the possibility that a there's a limit on compactification inside a black hole and once it reaches that limit it becomes a whitehole. In other words the radius of a black hole can never actually become a singularity.
Originally posted by frogstompYea, like the bacteria in the drop of water thinking he's discovered the whole universe. Then the scientist looks at the bateria through the microscope and shakes his head.
We are busy on #2 ,,unlike the fundies who only read the bible ( see my previous post) ,, and are expanding Ekpyrotics in to a Cyclic universe.
There is also the possibility that a there's a limit on compactification inside a black hole and once it reaches that limit it becomes a whitehole. In other words the radius of a black hole can never actually become a singularity.
Originally posted by frogstompProbably not quite as dense as that first dot of matter. C'mon Froogy, you really gonna tell me that all the matter in the universe was squashed into a dot the size of a period on a page? Man, that is one crowded dot! Apparently this happens every few billion years! You can forget about global warming... We're gonna be squished!
I never said you ever did a bowel movement, you probably haven't , evidence is you're so full of it.
Originally posted by dj2beckerread my post to Meta. that answered your dumb question
Probably not quite as dense as that first dot of matter. C'mon Froogy, you really gonna tell me that all the matter in the universe was squashed into a dot the size of a period on a page? Man, that is one crowded dot! Apparently this happens every few billion years! You can forget about global warming... We're gonna be squished!