The Council of Nicea

The Council of Nicea

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
Do some historical research. Find out how and when the NT came to be. It will answer many of your questions (none of which Kelly will ever be able to).
I have looked into it but while my findings support my personal insight that the bible is not the complete, exclusive, inerrant word of God they were not the reason I have taken that position.

KellyJay is now so bound up that he is even refusing to concur that he believes that the bible IS the complete, exclude and inerrant word of God. I can understand why he is now adopting this stance on this forum.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@divegeester said
I’ve pointed out to him several times that faith in the bible rather than faith in God/Christ is a form of idolatry.
Kelly’s faith is, how shall I put this gently, uninformed. May I suggest you inform yourself? I recommend this to you: a well-respected historian looks at how the Bible came to be:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unauthorized-Version-Truth-Fiction-Bible/dp/0141022965/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=3UQN48CKSUKPA&keywords=unauthorized+version&qid=1671522256&sprefix=insuthotized+version%2Caps%2C111&sr=8-1

As I have pointed out several times, the NT cannot have been how the religion survived its first three centuries because the NT didn’t exist until the Council of Nicea. This is the bit Kelly and Bible worshippers just don’t get .

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
Kelly’s faith is, how shall I put this gently, uninformed. May I suggest you inform yourself?
And you wonder why we sometimes clash.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
As I have pointed out several times, the NT cannot have been how the religion survived its first three centuries because the NT didn’t exist until the Council of Nicea.
Hardly a revelation.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@divegeester said
Hardly a revelation.
Well, this bears investigation. Historical investigation, not just quoting and re-quoting bits of the NT or vapid tautologies as Kelly does (“truth is truth and cannot contradict itself” ).

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22

@divegeester said
And you wonder why we sometimes clash.
I would say, arguing at cross purposes.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
Well, this bears investigation. Historical investigation, not just quoting and re-quoting bits of the NT or vapid tautologies as Kelly does (“truth is truth and cannot contradict itself” ).
Have I ever done this to you? No.

Try to understand that when debating different people here one needs to use different frames of reference. KellyJay’s frame of reference is only the bible, therefore I use the bible to unpick his own arguments. He’s not going to accept secular references no matter how authentic they may be.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
I would say, arguing at cross purposes.
Nope I enjoy that, as do you.

Maybe you’re not as smart as I thought you were, or maybe you are being a tad dishonest by pretending you don’t get what I was pointing at in my post to which you are replying.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158338
20 Dec 22
2 edits

@moonbus said
Kelly’s faith is, how shall I put this gently, uninformed. May I suggest you inform yourself? I recommend this to you: a well-respected historian looks at how the Bible came to be:

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Unauthorized-Version-Truth-Fiction-Bible/dp/0141022965/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=3UQN48CKSUKPA&keywords=unauthorized+version&qid=1671522256&sprefix=insuthotized+version%2Caps ...[text shortened]... idn’t exist until the Council of Nicea. This is the bit Kelly and Bible worshippers just don’t get .
The letters and gospels were written way before the Council of Nicea, what you don't
get is that even without Nicea they were already written and passed down to other
Christians, just not what you call, "authorized". God doesn't require a man-made
blessing, but uses man to do His work. Your point the church could not have
survived sounds reasonable if you take God out of the equation which you are apt
to do, which is the part you don't get. Well-respected historians, who also don't
have God in play, are not sources I'm concerned about, as some disagree with
them, pick your historian.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158338
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@moonbus said
It was the Council of Nicea which chose precisely those scrolls to canonize, the ones which identified Jesus with the godhead, and destroyed the other gospels. Fortunately, a cache of other gospels did survive, and have been published as the Nag Hamadi Library. Every Christian should read them and thoroughly digest the alternative Christianities presented therein.
If you have a doctrine that runs contrary to what is in the Bible, speak out and talk
about it, because if it runs counter, that is why because they run counter they are
not part of the text, among other reasons. Jesus not being the Word of God, what
else do you have that only an Anti-Christ and Atheist would love to see in the Word
that a Christian would reject?

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@kellyjay said
If you have a doctrine that runs contrary to what is in the Bible, speak out and talk
about it, because if it runs counter, that is why because they run counter they are
not part of the text, among other reasons. Jesus not being the Word of God, what
else do you have that only an Anti-Christ and Atheist would love to see in the Word
that a Christian would reject?
KellyJay is the bible the complete, exclusive and inerrant word of God?

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

No reply, not even a “yes”.

What does that tell us!

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158338
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@divegeester said
KellyJay is the bible the complete, exclusive and inerrant word of God?
I've answered your question, you said you wanted something that would convince
you, I don't believe anything can convince you since you don't want to be convinced
so the only thing you are doing here by continuing to ask what was already given
you are that you see this as a means to harass me, so you can take cheap shots.

If you were interested in that question you would have asked specific questions
instead of saying that my whole answer was bad without an explanation to the
points you disliked, keep this up, we can stop all two-way conversations just a
warning.

If you are actually interested in that question, ask specific questions about the
points I have already given you, if not, you got what you got, and you can use it
for the real reason you are asking, just to harass and belittle, it is a game with you
that I'm not going to play.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@divegeester said
And so began the Roman Catholic Church, the mother of all the harlot churches and denominations down the centuries.

Jesus said “I will write my law on their hearts”.
For me this is one of the most powerful texts in the Bible.
Love God, love yourself, love your neighbor, forgive everyone including those who torment you. If people had actually followed his example, instead of propagating doctrines and dogmas, there would have been a whole lot less horror these last two millennia. No pogroms, no witch burning, no crusades, no heresy trials.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
252648
20 Dec 22

@divegeester said
And so began the Roman Catholic Church, the mother of all the harlot churches and denominations down the centuries.

Jesus said “I will write my law on their hearts”.
For me this is one of the most powerful texts in the Bible.
Indeed .. written in the hearts of all men. Add that to the one that says, the free gift of justification came on all men, and you have the proof that anyone can enter the Kingdom of God if they practice charity per Matt 25.