@moonbus said
@KellyJay
when we see information controlling things with stop-starts, level monitoring, error checking, even duplication to a degree without running out of control it is due to a mind, not some mindless haphazard piece of chance and necessity.
If we are talking about a computer program, then all these things you see are really literally factually there, the con ...[text shortened]... ld dominated by magic because it makes some sort of sense to you. I don't need that kind of 'sense'.
I think you are still not seeing the big picture here, processes can do things like cause a falling leaf due to gravity, we can call that natural if you will, and still, there is order to that which is mathematically predictable. Our ability to monitor the universe and make sense of it all with precision isn't due to the haphazard nature of the universe, it's due to the design we see in it. I pointed out earlier that even the charge on an electron is part of the whole. The forces we see in the universe that keeps the universe from flying apart or collapsing upon itself are due to the highly fine-tuning of the forces in the universe and the mass.
We can read DNA, we are mapping it, so we can view the code, and can tell who it belongs to what DNA, we can read a menu, see the words and pictures and know what it is saying. Our computer programming knowledge and our language skill give us the ability to read and write so that we recognize intelligence at work even if we don't understand a language we can see and recognize one. We listen for sounds in outer space, and frankly here on earth, trying and find some that are not "natural' in occurrence, there is a difference between morse code and static. We monitor the oceans looking for things that are not naturally occurring but are man-made which we call human pollution, there is a difference between what is done with intelligence and what is naturally occurring, like leaves falling.
We see what is going on in life's genetic code, that it acts with precision on a level we cannot match, we see things in biology we cannot do, and we cannot recreate what we see even with all of our efforts and knowledge, and if we do, would that prove lives processes are due to mindlessness or a mind if we work it out?
We use metaphors to help us identify something in terms that make sense to help us understand something better, it is no small thing that when we say what is going on in life is a biological code causing things to start and stop, we see biological feedback loops that are used to monitor things, that life processes are controlled to do exactly what they are supposed to do or life can either become unhealthy or die.
We see code in life because we know what digital code and languages are and how functional instructions cause things to do specified work in a precise manner. What stops some from acknowledging that has nothing to do with what we see, only the worldview ramifications of that acknowledgment, you see it, you know the metaphor fits precisely, but then deny it as Dawkins does, you acknowledge its there, but refuse to call it for what it is.
“The beauty of biology, really, is the illusion of design,” Dawkins
The illusion is found when we see something, but refuse to acknowledge what is right in front of us, so we deny it, and say things like, it replicates, and that is that, refusing to look at it with a thought to how and why.