The Destruction of Babylon

Originally posted by Proper Knob
But if you claim John will destroy Glasgow and throw some stones into the Clyde and it turns out Steve does it instead you are wrong.

No not wrong, the prophecy was not fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzer in its entirety, thus it
was ongoing, why must you limit it in this way?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
But if you claim John will destroy Glasgow and throw some stones into the Clyde and it turns out Steve does it instead you are wrong.

Right. Now prove your point, if you can. 😏

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I made it up for the inhabitants of tyre, dont know if its accurate or not.

RJHinds talk to robbie, not me.

Originally posted by FMF
RJHinds talk to robbie, not me.

No RJH talk to FMF, he also used it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No not wrong, the prophecy was not fulfilled by Nebuchadnezzer in its entirety, thus it
was ongoing, why must you limit it in this way?

I'm limiting myself to the text contained in the Bible.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I'm limiting myself to the text contained in the Bible.

but clearly if that is the case then you will realise that its an ongoing prophecy, for the
evidence states that Nebuchadnezzar , while destroying the city, did not destroy it
completely, thus, its fulfilment must be future.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
but clearly if that is the case then you will realise that its an ongoing prophecy, for the
evidence states that Nebuchadnezzar , while destroying the city, did not destroy it
completely, thus, its fulfilment must be future.

Where does the Bible state the prophesy is 'ongoing'?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Where does the Bible state the prophesy is 'ongoing'?

well if it states that something will happen and it does not happen in its entirety, then its
understood that its ongoing. The mere fact that another prophet also prophesied
about Tyres destruction many years after the initial prophetic utterance would indicate
this, would it not?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
well if it states that something will happen and it does not happen in its entirety, then its
understood that its ongoing. The mere fact that another prophet also prophesied
about Tyres destruction many years after the initial prophetic utterance would indicate
this, would it not?

So the Bible doesn't state that the prophesy is ongoing? I've read the text, i can see no mention of the word 'ongoing' anywhere.

It's quite explicit that Nebu, whatever his name is, will destroy the city for ever.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
So the Bible doesn't state that the prophesy is ongoing? I've read the text, i can see no mention of the word 'ongoing' anywhere.

It's quite explicit that Nebu, whatever his name is, will destroy the city for ever.

ok believe what you want.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ok believe what you want.

I think it's you who's believing what he wants, i'm just going on the text.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I think it's you who's believing what he wants, i'm just going on the text.

ok.

Originally posted by FMF
RJHinds talk to robbie, not me.

I don't believe you are going to find any Tyreans in Sour, Lebanon,
which is the town some incorrectly refer to as Tyre because of its
location at the ruins of the ancient Tyre.

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't believe you are going to find any Tyreans in Sour, Lebanon,
which is the town some incorrectly refer to as Tyre because of its
location at the ruins of the ancient Tyre.

Well, in that case Babylon has already been rebuilt. I think it's located in New York now.

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
Well, in that case Babylon has already been rebuilt. I think it's located in New York now.

I would appreciate it if you would not spam up the thread with nonsense
and wild speculations. 😛