The  Eternal Son of God

The Eternal Son of God

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
25 Dec 18
3 edits

Some critic here who has more points then he knows how to deal with uses "waffle" and "hairdryer" as his excuse for not being able to refute them.

Argument by boredom and insult.

The three "persons" (used with caution) of the Godhead are co-eternal, But they also went through two economical BECAMES in order to accomplish the eternal purpose of God.

The First BECAME - "The Word BECAME flesh" (John 1:14)

The Second BECAME - "the last Adam [Christ] BECAME a life giving Spirit" (1 Cor. 15:45).

No one can deny these facts as stated in the Bible.
If we have trouble comprehending them, that's too bad.

By experiencing the Triune God we will be brought into more understanding.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

Of course according to sonship his position in this thread “transends our ability to figure it out”.

Convenient 😆

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
25 Dec 18
2 edits

@divegeester

Of course according to sonship his position in this thread “transends our ability to figure it out”.


Go learn what this means heretic.

"The PEACE of God which surpasses every man's understanding ..." (Phil. 4:7)

You know, actually READING the New Testament sometime might do wonders for you.

Brain Bragger.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@sonship said
@divegeester

Of course according to sonship his position in this thread “transends our ability to figure it out”.


Go learn what this means heretic.

"The PEACE of God which surpasses every man's understanding ..." (Phil. 4:7)

You know, actually READING the New Testament sometime might do wonders for you.

Brain Bragger.
Works for the “peace of God” doesn’t work for the errors of sonship.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@sonship said
@divegeester heretic.
Tut tut sonship

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
25 Dec 18

@divegeester

Works for the “peace of God” doesn’t work for the errors of sonship.


You're not able to point out any error.
So I'm not concerned at all.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
25 Dec 18
1 edit

I said you, Divegeester, are not able to POINT OUT any error in what I wrote.

Mainly, because I just use the Bible to speak for itself.

I wait for some dazzling logic from you to prove the statements of the Scripture wrong. None come from you.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@sonship said
@divegeester

Works for the “peace of God” doesn’t work for the errors of sonship.


You're not able to point out any error.
So I'm not concerned at all.
There is no such thing as the “eternal son” as I have clearly, succinctly and irrefutably demonstrated.

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@sonship said
I said you, Divegeester, are not able to POINT OUT any error in what I wrote.

Mainly, because I just use the Bible to speak for itself.

I wait for some dazzling logic from you to prove the statements of the Scripture wrong. None come from you.
You’ve had it.

To use the KellyJay ideology which he uses on FMF: you know it’s true you are just rejecting it.

Happy Christmas sonship!

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
25 Dec 18
1 edit

@divegeester said
There is no such thing as the “eternal son” as I have clearly, succinctly and irrefutably demonstrated.
1 Timothy 1:17
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Try to wrap your mind around that verse divegeester. It is referring to Jesus, right?

It does say things like eternal, immortal and only wise God, right?

Jesus is the son of God, right?

Can you put two and two together? Or is it beyond your comprehension to learn how wrong you are?

Don't worry. We won't say we told you so. We would be more than happy for you to awaken out of sleep.

But right now we're very sad. 🙁

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
25 Dec 18

@divegeester said
You’ve had it.

To use the KellyJay ideology which he uses on FMF: you know it’s true you are just rejecting it.

Happy Christmas sonship!
So you use FMF for inspiration and not the scriptures.

Comes through in all your posts. Just how close are you two? Is FMF your mentor and pastor/teacher?

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@secondson said
So you use FMF for inspiration and not the scriptures.

Comes through in all your posts. Just how close are you two? Is FMF your mentor and pastor/teacher?
He is my good friend, just like you said ghostofaduke is your “good friend” 🙂

Fighting for men’s

right to have babies

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117216
25 Dec 18

@secondson said
1 Timothy 1:17
Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Try to wrap your mind around that verse divegeester. It is referring to Jesus, right?

It does say things like eternal, immortal and only wise God, right?

Jesus is the son of God, right?

Can you put two and two together? Or is it beyond ...[text shortened]... u so. We would be more than happy for you to awaken out of sleep.

But right now we're very sad. 🙁
I’ve fully explained my position on this topic twice in this thread; please go back and read it again.

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
25 Dec 18

@divegeester said
He is my good friend, just like you said ghostofaduke is your “good friend” 🙂
You can have any friend you want. What's it to me?

The point is he's your mentor and teacher, it's where you draw your inspiration, talking points and forum posting behavior.

You certainly haven't demonstrated that the Word of God is where you learn your theology or from which you get your doctrine.

Maybe you just don't have the aptitude for it. IDK 🤷🏻‍♂️

Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
25 Dec 18

@divegeester said
I’ve fully explained my position on this topic twice in this thread; please go back and read it again.
Obviously your position is at variance with the clear teaching of scripture.

So much so that you use the argument "I've fully explained my position" as a way of deflecting away from the clear teaching of the verse I quoted, which, by the way, is on point.