22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou can make any assertion you want.
I believe you have lied in this thread.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy? Because I believe you knowingly lied about divegeester [in 2020 and repeatedly ever since] with regard to the radio programme? That's not "hypocrisy".
Yes I am. You are a hypocrite.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidObviously, and I won't be surprised if you are still traipsing around after me and yapping at my heels in this way for years to come.
Just calling it how I see it.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhen you claimed that you were calling it how you see it, I believe you were lying. It's OK for me to say I am calling it how I see it if I am telling the truth. No hypocrisy on my part.
It is not ok for me to call it how I see it, but it is ok for you to do so.
Hypocrite.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe idea that divegeester was involved in the production of the radio show is ludicrous and you did not believe that he was. It was just something you claimed you believed to create some extra spite in that private club thread that I read. It's the most bared-faced lie you have told in this whole affair.
I was also telling the truth. Your view on that doesn't change the fact.
22 Feb 23
@fmf saidThat's a rather daft red herring. The 'fingerprints' relates to the two of you being symbiotic in your relationship and unlikely to do anything mischievous without the involvement or knowledge of the other.
The idea that divegeester was involved in the production of the radio show is ludicrous and you did not believe that he was. It was just something you claimed you believed to create some extra spite in that private club thread that I read. It's the most bared-faced lie you have told in this whole affair.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are lying if you claim you actually thought he was involved in the way the radio show was presented. You were just being vindictive in your private group.
That's a rather daft red herring. The 'fingerprints' relates to the two of you being symbiotic in your relationship and unlikely to do anything mischievous without the involvement or knowledge of the other.
22 Feb 23
@fmf saidAgain, the 'fingerprints' relates to the two of you being symbiotic in your relationship and unlikely to do anything mischievous without the involvement or knowledge of the other.
You are lying if you claim you actually thought he was involved in the way the radio show was presented. You were just being vindictive in your private group.
I was 99% certain at the time.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI was 99% certain at the time.
Again, the 'fingerprints' relates to the two of you being symbiotic in your relationship and unlikely to do anything mischievous without the involvement or knowledge of the other.
I was 99% certain at the time.
I think this is a bare-faced lie motivated by spite and one that you are still propagating two and a half years later.
22 Feb 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidMaking this claim does not make you a hypocrite.
I believe you have lied in this thread.