Originally posted by VoidSpirit[/b][b]Its not about gaps.............there is no evidence only similarities.
Because of similarities they fabricate the story of evolution.
They have no idea how the first living cells came to be.
They have no idea how the universe came to be.
they don't make the claim of knowing. they do however postulate possibilities based ...[text shortened]... author doesn't know much about biology and is not qualified to discuss evolution in any way.
to think, an archeologist telling biologists whats what in their field.
Neither Richard L Thompson (aka Sadaputa Dasa) nor Michael Cremo (aka Drutakarma Dasa) have any qualifications as archaeologists.
Incidentally, Richard Thompson's wikipedia entry has been recently deleted. The discussion that led to this concluded that: "There are no reliable sources independent of the subject [of vedic creationism] that show how he is a notable person who has made any notable contribution to his field of study."
Originally posted by DasaThat is a good one, Dasa. But I would have to see it to believe it.
They certainly don't come about by and explosion.
Do this scientific experiment please.
Go into your laboratory and set of an explosion and see what happens.
If you don't get conscious life appearing and everything else then do the experiment again.
If you like perform the experiment one million times.
When you have anything at all coming form your explosions........let me know.
This is my proof.
I would not take the word of these lying atheists.
Originally posted by RJHindsI will give you that the Universe is here. The universe is tangible and measurable. God is not tangible or measurable. The only way god exists is as a rather feeble idea in the irrational brains of theists. One primate fossil is way more tangible than god.
Get your heat out! The whole universe is evidence. You just
lack the intelligence (or something) to see it.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatRichard L Thompson has PhD in mathematics specializing in mathematical biology.to think, an archeologist telling biologists whats what in their field.
Neither Richard L Thompson (aka Sadaputa Dasa) nor Michael Cremo (aka Drutakarma Dasa) have any qualifications as archaeologists.
Incidentally, Richard Thompson's wikipedia entry has been recently deleted. The discussion that led to this concluded that: ...[text shortened]... how he is a notable person who has made any notable contribution to his field of study."[/b][/b]
He also has a masters in Astro Physics.
He also specializes in probability theory and statistical mechanics.
Richard L Thompson travelled the world with M. Cremo to produce the book Forbidden Archeology.
They were not armchair scientists.
They worked the field and inspected every archaeological find that was to be investigated over an exhaustive 8 year period..
They reviewed every paper that was ever written by every person connected to archeological discoveries.
They interview every person still living in connection to archeological finds.
Forbidden Archeology and The Hidden History of the Human Race and De Evolution are books presenting the truth of the extreme human antiquity.
These books are for honest persons only.
Originally posted by DasaEr... no. Just... no.
Richard L Thompson has PhD in mathematics specializing in mathematical biology.
He also has a masters in Astro Physics.
He also specializes in probability theory and statistical mechanics.
Richard L Thompson travelled the world with M. Cremo to produce the book Forbidden Archeology.
They were not armchair scientists.
They worked the field and ins ...[text shortened]... presenting the truth of the extreme human antiquity.
These books are for honest persons only.
1 edit
Originally posted by Dasa
They certainly don't come about by and explosion.
Do this scientific experiment please.
Go into your laboratory and set of an explosion and see what happens.
If you don't get conscious life appearing and everything else then do the experiment again.
there is no accepted scientific theory postulating that conscious life came about as a direct result of an explosion.
If you like perform the experiment one million times.
When you have anything at all coming form your explosions........let me know.
This is my proof.
when you learn what scientific theories actually theorize, get back to me. your strawman arguments aren't arguments at all.
Originally posted by avalanchethecatmy apologies to the field of archeology and archeologists.to think, an archeologist telling biologists whats what in their field.
Neither Richard L Thompson (aka Sadaputa Dasa) nor Michael Cremo (aka Drutakarma Dasa) have any qualifications as archaeologists.
Incidentally, Richard Thompson's wikipedia entry has been recently deleted. The discussion that led to this concluded that: ...[text shortened]... how he is a notable person who has made any notable contribution to his field of study."[/b][/b]
Originally posted by VoidSpiritIf it is not some type of noisey explosion, then why do they call itOriginally posted by Dasa
[b]They certainly don't come about by and explosion.
Do this scientific experiment please.
Go into your laboratory and set of an explosion and see what happens.
If you don't get conscious life appearing and everything else then do the experiment again.
there is no accepted scientific theory po ...[text shortened]... theories actually theorize, get back to me. your strawman arguments aren't arguments at all.
"The Big Bang". They also refer to the time when all the complex
animals suddenly appeared as "The Cambrian Explosion".
Originally posted by 667joeYou have no idea where that one primate fossil came from. You only listen
I will give you that the Universe is here. The universe is tangible and measurable. God is not tangible or measurable. The only way god exists is as a rather feeble idea in the irrational brains of theists. One primate fossil is way more tangible than god.
to other men, who claim to knowhow to figure it all out with speculations and
quesses. You probably would not know the fossil was from a primate if
one of these liars had not told you.
Originally posted by RJHindsBut it is still more real than any proof you have of god of whom you only learned of from other humans. I hazard to say god has not revealed itself to you directly.
You have no idea where that one primate fossil came from. You only listen
to other men, who claim to knowhow to figure it all out with speculations and
quesses. You probably would not know the fossil was from a primate if
one of these liars had not told you.
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsAt least these people are still alive to question. You, conversely, listen to speculations and guesses of other men who died hundreds of years ago. You wouldn't even know if Jesus had existed had these liars* not told you so.
You have no idea where that one primate fossil came from. You only listen
to other men, who claim to knowhow to figure it all out with speculations and
quesses. You probably would not know the fossil was from a primate if
one of these liars had not told you.
(* Dunno if they are liars, just creating resonance there. But then, you don't know if the palaeontologists and archaeologists you refer to are liars either, do you?)