Originally posted by The Dude 84
It has been the Christian agenda to manipulate kids into believing their religion before they are capable of remembering their own phone number. How many babies have given express consent for their baptization?
And how are children being "fed" this movie? Unlike religious parents who force their kids to go to Sunday school a child has a choice whethe would only be doing the exact same thing as religion, albeit in a much more enjoyable way.
I had decided to leave these posts unreplied to as I was what I assumed other peoples opinions were, and these were not necessarily my own.
However, I was contemplating children being "brainwashed" by religion in the shower today, and I realised that most religious events/propaganda that a child would be subject to could be avoided if the parents so wish. A teacher would, I'm sure, take no offence in removing a child from a schools christmas celebrations, and I'm equally sure a good teacher would try to do this subtly!; a child does not go to sunday school without their parents consent, etc.
Such things have a clear Christian message. However, this film, had different parts of the church not started voicing their opinions, would have been subtly knifing* religion - many would not know what the story portrayed until they were in the cinema. I had no idea what the books were about before I started reading them. The church's fuss is, in effect if not in intent, a warning to parents of what the film is about.
*I had originally written "subtly against", then though I couldn't resist the pun, but then i realised it doesn't quite get my point across. I am not saying that the story is subtle in it's stance against religion, meerly that before entering into the trilogy/the cinema there is nothing that gives any impression of the religious content of the story. Before reading the books or entering the cinema, it's sentiment is suble.