Originally posted by FMFactually can you point to where doctor digs states that there is no logical distinction between homosexuality and child rape, thanks.
For a moralizer, it's odd that you cannot state whether you feel "any hatred [or] animosity towards" adults who rape children? On a thread a few months ago you blurted out that [if it were up to you, which it isn't] you'd want to hang them by their testicles or castrate them or some such, as you will remember. But here you are unable to say anything unequivocal ...[text shortened]... you 'have absolutely no idea what Doctor Diggs feels" about adults raping children.
Originally posted by FMFwhether it usual or unusual is not the point, the fact is it returned a percent of 22, I cited other studies with similar result's.
You often talk about 'empirical methods'. Do you contend that if data is gathered in unusual circumstances it can nevertheless be accepted as reflecting the usual behavior of the group being researched? Sounds fundamentally flawed in terms of methodology to me.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat's not what i'm asking. If anal sex is such an abomination in Gods eyes, and God is responsible for creating us, then why did he create us with the capacity to derive such pleasure from anal sex?
people derive pleasure from intravenously injecting opiates, pleasure has never been a particularly strong justification for morally questionable practices.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut it is you who is trying to use the date to back your personal opinions. Even though it has been shown to be flawed, you are nevertheless persisting with the data - apparently because it fits with your opinions.
nope, i did not produce the data, i did not write the Bible,
Originally posted by Rank outsidercan you sight where doctor Diggs states that there should be no logical distinction between homosexuality and child rape?
Do you think that, if I believe that homosexual sex is socially acceptable (which I do), that therefore I have no logical reason to deny social acceptability to some who wants to rape my son?
And that one will lead from the other?
Originally posted by FMFnope they are not my personal opinions, strike two, three and you are out, AGAIN.
But it is you who is trying to use the date to back your personal opinions. Even though it has been shown to be flawed, you are nevertheless persisting with the data - apparently because it fits with your opinions.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut is it sound methodology in terms of producing valid empirical data? Is it empirically sound to extrapolate 'the usual behavior' of a group being researched from data that has been gathered in unusual circumstances, such as from an unrepresentative sample?
whether it usual or unusual is not the point, the fact is it returned a percent of 22, I cited other studies with similar result's.
Originally posted by Proper Knobperhaps you had better ask the same question to those who are deriving as much pleasure from chronic illness, due to HIV, how would they answer you? The point is, as i have stated, many things may be pleasurable, it does not mean they are healthy and the fact that we derive pleasures from them is no indication that they should be morally acceptable.
That's not what i'm asking. If anal sex is such an abomination in Gods eyes, and God is responsible for creating us, then why did he create us with the capacity to derive such pleasure from anal sex?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by robbie carrobiedo you really think i was questioning somebodies ability to accurately calculate a percentage? if you are just going to constantly attempt to misunderstand simple points to be difficult, why bother debating as its the equivalent of giving up (it shouldnt even be described as 'debating'😉. if you genuinely dont understand how simple mathematical statistics work in relation to collecting and reporting data, just say so. its nothing to be embarrassed about.........well it is a little.
why not, are you saying that the return was not 22 percent, no? well, then, shut-up-o -ya-face!
Originally posted by FMFok, you are out, you could not stick to the script, goodbye AGAIN, you simply will not leave me out of it., pity that i can have discussions with others who are prepared to argue on the basis of evidence and dont need to resort to the typical attacks at the man which marrs your posting style throughout.
Whose opinions are your opinions then?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy do you think God created us with the capacity to derive pleasure from anal sex?
perhaps you had better ask the same question to those who are deriving as much pleasure from chronic illness, due to HIV, how would they answer you? The point is, as i have stated, many things may be pleasurable, it does not mean they are healthy and the fact that we derive pleasures from them is no indication that they should be morally acceptable.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe were discussing the soundness of methodology in terms of producing valid empirical data. How is it not part of the "script"?
ok, you are out, you could not stick to the script, goodbye AGAIN, you simply will not leave me out of it., pity that i can have discussions with others who are prepared to argue on the basis of evidence and dont need to resort to the typical attacks at the man which marrs your posting style throughout.