Originally posted by stellspalfiewhat are you havering about? you cannot state why 22 percent should not be acceptable other than to state that the info was gathered from a gay porno magazine, would you be so inclined to dispute data from some lads magazine, 22 percent sated that some porno queens boobs were more shapely, no i doubt you would as well.
do you really think i was questioning somebodies ability to accurately calculate a percentage? if you are just going to constantly attempt to misunderstand simple points to be difficult, why bother debating as its the equivalent of giving up (it shouldnt even be described as 'debating'😉. if you genuinely dont understand how simple mathematical statistic ...[text shortened]... reporting data, just say so. its nothing to be embarrassed about.........well it is a little.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieseriously though, whose opinions are your opinions robbie?
ok, you are out, you could not stick to the script, goodbye AGAIN, you simply will not leave me out of it., pity that i can have discussions with others who are prepared to argue on the basis of evidence and dont need to resort to the typical attacks at the man which marrs your posting style throughout.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOkay. Why did God create us with the ability to derive pleasure from anal sex, and also why did God create us with the ability to derive such pleasure from drugs if both practices are sinful?
point? why did god create us with the capacity to enjoy pleasure from intravenously injecting opiates? are you stating that its also good and positive to do so? well then, behave.
Originally posted by stellspalfieI am not discussing my opinions, i am trying to discuss this theme objectively , but because you people will not do that, i need to reel you in from time to time, so please, leave me out of it, your questions directed towards my person will be ignored.
seriously though, whose opinions are your opinions robbie?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieobviously you are a bit thick then.
what are you havering about? you cannot state why 22 percent should not be acceptable other than to state that the info was gathered from a gay porno magazine, would you be so inclined to dispute data from some lads magazine, 22 percent sated that some porno queens boobs were more shapely, no i doubt you would as well.
the data collected is not a fair representation of gay society if its collected from a gay porn magazine
do you feel the demographic who read 'barely 18' is a fair representation of all male heterosexual behavior?
these are basic concepts to understand, i dont want to patronize you, but a kid doing gcse maths knows how to create a fair study, didnt you say you were 42!!
Originally posted by robbie carrobie* BUMP *
4)that there may be a correlation between homosexuality and paedophilia is yet a matter of conjecture, I am quite sure that in some instances homosexuals have perpetrated rapes against minors, that he holds that both are morally unacceptable is not to state that one cannot logically distinguish between the two, it is merely to state that both are unacceptable.
Do you think there is also a correlation between heterosexuality and paedophilia? Do you think that in some instances heterosexuals too have perpetrated rapes against minors?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYour religious beliefs concerning homosexuality and you how you corroborate those views with 'scientific data' is not about you? Is this a wind up? I refuse to accept that anyone can be this dense. You're winding us up aren't you Rob?
I am not discussing my opinions, i am trying to discuss this theme objectively , but because you people will not do that, i need to reel you in from time to time, so please, leave me out of it, your questions directed towards my person will be ignored.
Originally posted by stellspalfiethis has been addressed before, it was never claimed to be entirely representative, it was merely provided to demonstrate that it happened, please point out where Dr. Diggs states that it is representative of the entire gay community as you are claiming, thanks, and i will be pleased if you refrained from bringing my intelligence into, see my chess rating, its 1800+, see yours, its 1400, you got that.
obviously you are a bit thick then.
the data collected is not a fair representation of gay society if its collected from a gay porn magazine
[b]do you feel the demographic who read 'barely 18' is a fair representation of all male heterosexual behavior?
these are basic concepts to understand, i dont want to patronize you, but a kid doing gcse maths knows how to create a fair study, didnt you say you were 42!![/b]