15 Feb '12 20:37>
Originally posted by knightmeisterI think you need to re-read my post in this thread explaining my position on this important doctrinal issue. You will see I've not forgotten anything nor am I being dishonest; mearly using clearly stated unambiguous scripture to offer explanation of why I believe what I do. The only "fudging" is when trinitarians claim 3 is 1, but actually three really. I'm sorry if I'm a little irritated with you but I find your replies a insulting when you insunuate my postion is dishonest.
is so fundamentally wrong about the nature of a God who spent the entire OT stating precisely the opposite that I find it hard to understand why people accept it just because they have been taught it.
----------------------------------dive---------------------------------
I don't "accept it because I was taught it" - this is a misconception. Anot ...[text shortened]... ing to be comforted by an impersonal force or IT!!!?? It's truly a bizarre idea!