19 Apr '06 19:43>
Originally posted by HalitoseI wouldn't know, but historically poverty has lead to an increase in childbirth for whatever reasons. A guess would be that when our very physical existence is threatened, or somehow uncertain, we need to ensure that our genes are passed on to a new generation. The more children we have the more likely it is that at least some of them will survive the harsh reality we live in (plus, it's fun to procreate and the bigger the family the stronger their social status and the more likely you are to get good care when you grow old - that is, assuming the child survives the first ten or so years, which is a fact often overlooked as you're poor and procreating).
Wouldn't poverty encourage fewer children rather than more in a modern European setting?
If on the other hand we feel perfectly safe and in control of our lives, we tend to think less of such things. We still want to pass on our genes to the next generation, but we are much more likely to consider things such as being able to provide for the child and give him/her a good childhood, rather than simply hoping the child will learn quickly how to survive and then leave it to do just that. Also, we will most likely pursue our own interests much more diligently if we don't have that black cloud of poverty hanging over our heads all the time; creating a constant worry about how to get food on the table and keep the right to a roof the upcoming month.