15 Jan '10 07:11>
Originally posted by PalynkaWell, yes. I simply find the idea of some actual person giving rise to a very particular myth more plausible, because more simple, than the alternatives. In the case of Jesus, along with the 'mythic hero' are created apostles, disciples and even, somehow, early Christians. I've read a similar argument somewhere claiming Mohammed was also dreamt up. Well, maybe ...
I also don't know which one is more likely. I definitely agree that Price overdoes the myth position. He seems to have an axe to grind, while I have not. I'm interested in this subject because not only I like ancient history, but it's also something that seems to contradict conventional wisdom.
On an aside, regarding the idea of Jesus as folk hero -- hero of what folk? Nor am I aware of any folk heroes that claim to be 'the Way, the Truth and the Life' and so on. In fact it seems that not a few Jews felt a bit let down that he wasn't the folk hero they were expecting: the Messiah who would drive the Romans into the sea. The way he played with their expectations is quite fascinating ... Also, the form of the gospels -- the peculiar combination of myth and historical texture -- is enough to persuade me that whatever we are dealing with, it's not a folk hero.