1. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    03 Dec '09 10:06
    http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

    watcha think about it?
  2. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    04 Dec '09 00:491 edit
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

    watcha think about it?
    It's not a new Bible. It's a new translation.

    Wouldn't it be easier to teach everybody English?
  3. Joined
    30 Aug '06
    Moves
    28651
    04 Dec '09 00:542 edits
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    http://www.lolcatbible.com/index.php?title=Main_Page

    watcha think about it?
    I only use The King James Version.
    If it was good enough for Jesus, then it's good enough for me. 😏
  4. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    04 Dec '09 00:59
    Originally posted by Ice Cold
    I only use The King James Version.
    If it was good enough for Jesus, then it's good enough for me. 😏
    The King James is a translation. All the rest of the English Bibles are versions.
  5. tinyurl.com/ywohm
    Joined
    01 May '07
    Moves
    27860
    04 Dec '09 01:06
    Originally posted by josephw
    The King James is a translation. All the rest of the English Bibles are versions.
    No, the rest are translations as well. Many "versions" as you call them went back to earlier documents to translate them.
  6. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    the Devil himself
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    91521
    04 Dec '09 05:11
    Originally posted by Ice Cold
    I only use The King James Version.
    If it was good enough for Jesus, then it's good enough for me. 😏
    What? Jesus read the King James version? Really? gosh I'm slow..
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    04 Dec '09 05:57
    Originally posted by josephw
    The King James is a translation. All the rest of the English Bibles are versions.
    I am curious, do you actually believe that?

    In the preface of one copy of the King James that I saw it quite clearly stated that it was not to be taken as a final accurate translation but that later translations were expected to be better.
  8. Joined
    07 Jan '08
    Moves
    34575
    04 Dec '09 07:29
    Originally posted by josephw
    It's not a new Bible. It's a new translation.

    Wouldn't it be easier to teach everybody English?
    Totally with you here.
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    04 Dec '09 08:15
    Originally posted by josephw
    Wouldn't it be easier to teach everybody English?
    No, not at all. Have you tried teaching LOL cats English? Besides, it is not really a translation.
  10. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    04 Dec '09 08:52
    it makes for a nice and funny read. i haven't got to the part about the gruesome laws of the OT but i am curious how does "kill anyone who does illegal stuff" translate into lolspeak.
  11. tinyurl.com/ywohm
    Joined
    01 May '07
    Moves
    27860
    04 Dec '09 13:00
    Originally posted by Zahlanzi
    it makes for a nice and funny read. i haven't got to the part about the gruesome laws of the OT but i am curious how does "kill anyone who does illegal stuff" translate into lolspeak.
    Is that the Q & A version?

    I can haz cheezburger?

    No! You cantz mix meat and dairy!
  12. Joined
    04 Feb '05
    Moves
    29132
    04 Dec '09 13:13
    just read some leviticus and i gotta say it is a lot more readable in lolspeak.

    Leviticus 1
    Teh Ceiling Cat saiz to Mozes, "O hai! Outta ur tabby-nackels, d00dthx.2 U should go saiz this to Izrulites, for to IM me, Hey Ceiling Cat, I can has stuff 🙂 and liek that, they gotta bring me teh cheezeburgers or other good stuff for impruvin teh conneckshun winkwink."
  13. Joined
    30 Aug '06
    Moves
    28651
    05 Dec '09 02:34
    Originally posted by pawnhandler
    No, the rest are translations as well. Many "versions" as you call them went back to earlier documents to translate them.
    Covering my ass noted. 🙂
  14. Joined
    30 Aug '06
    Moves
    28651
    05 Dec '09 02:35
    Originally posted by josephw
    The King James is a translation. All the rest of the English Bibles are versions.
    Dude, do you think I was serious? 😕
    Correction noted 🙂
  15. Joined
    07 Jan '08
    Moves
    34575
    05 Dec '09 03:54
    Originally posted by josephw
    The King James is a translation. All the rest of the English Bibles are versions.
    The KJV is an Anglo-Saxon translation. It's a difficult read because modern English isn't purely Anglo-Saxon as it was then.

    My favorite translation is NRSV, translated from Hebrew and Greek.

    Some Bibles are paraphrases, not versions, such as the Living Bible.
Back to Top